CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name: Programme: Module Title: Module Tutor: Assignment Submission Date: * Please note that this is an indicative mark which will remain provisional until ratified, or amended, by the Assessment Board AGREED INDICATIVE MARK* DATE Mark Range Criteria 90-100% Distinction Demonstrates an exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence. The work has the potential to influence the forefront of the subject, and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. 80-89% Distinction Demonstrates an outstanding ability and insight based on authoritative subject knowledge and a very high level of technical competence. The work is considered to be close to the forefront of the subject, and may be close to publishable/exhibitable quality. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level. 70-79% Distinction Demonstrates an authoritative, current subject knowledge and a high level of technical competence. The work is accurate and extensively supported by appropriate evidence. It may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically and deal with ambiguity in the data. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a high level. 60-69% Demonstrates a sound, current subject knowledge. No significant errors in the application of concepts or appropriate techniques. May contain some minor flaws. CBWB Project INDIVIDUAL COURSEWORK(1).docx.pdf Saved to Dropbox • 16 May 2017, 16K2960-69% Merit minor flaws. The work is well developed and coherent; may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a good level. 50 – 59% Pass Demonstrates satisfactory subject knowledge. Some evident weaknesses; possibly shown by conceptual gaps, or limited use of appropriate techniques. The work is generally sound but tends toward the factual or derivative. Limited evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are generally at a satisfactory level. 40 -49% Fail Demonstrates limited subject knowledge. Some important weaknesses; possibly shown by factual errors, conceptual gaps, or weak use of appropriate techniques. The work tends toward the factual / derivative, or lacks sound development. Little evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 30-39% Demonstrates inadequate subject knowledge. The work lacks coherence and evidence of capacity to reflect critically. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 20-29% Demonstrates seriously inadequate knowledge of the subject. The work contains minimal evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 10-19% The work is almost entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge of the subject. No evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 0-9% The work presents information that is irrelevant and unconnected to the task. No evident awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques. 60-69% Merit minor flaws. The work is well developed and coherent; may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a good level. 50 – 59% Pass Demonstrates satisfactory subject knowledge. Some evident weaknesses; possibly shown by conceptual gaps, or limited use of appropriate techniques. The work is generally sound but tends toward the factual or derivative. Limited evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are generally at a satisfactory level. 40 -49% Fail Demonstrates limited subject knowledge. Some important weaknesses; possibly shown by factual errors, conceptual gaps, or weak use of appropriate techniques. The work tends toward the factual / derivative, or lacks sound development. Little evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 30-39% Demonstrates inadequate subject knowledge. The work lacks coherence and evidence of capacity to reflect critically. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 20-29% Demonstrates seriously inadequate knowledge of the subject. The work contains minimal evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 10-19% The work is almost entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge of the subject. No evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 0-9% The work presents information that is irrelevant and unconnected to the task. No evident awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques. 60-69% Merit minor flaws. The work is well developed and coherent; may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a good level. 50 – 59% Pass Demonstrates satisfactory subject knowledge. Some evident weaknesses; possibly shown by conceptual gaps, or limited use of appropriate techniques. The work is generally sound but tends toward the factual or derivative. Limited evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are generally at a satisfactory level. 40 -49% Fail Demonstrates limited subject knowledge. Some important weaknesses; possibly shown by factual errors, conceptual gaps, or weak use of appropriate techniques. The work tends toward the factual / derivative, or lacks sound development. Little evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 30-39% Demonstrates inadequate subject knowledge. The work lacks coherence and evidence of capacity to reflect critically. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 20-29% Demonstrates seriously inadequate knowledge of the subject. The work contains minimal evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 10-19% The work is almost entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge of the subject. No evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 0-9% The work presents information that is irrelevant and unconnected to the task. No evident awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques. 60-69% Merit minor flaws. The work is well developed and coherent; may show some originality. Clear evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a good level. 50 – 59% Pass Demonstrates satisfactory subject knowledge. Some evident weaknesses; possibly shown by conceptual gaps, or limited use of appropriate techniques. The work is generally sound but tends toward the factual or derivative. Limited evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills are generally at a satisfactory level. 40 -49% Fail Demonstrates limited subject knowledge. Some important weaknesses; possibly shown by factual errors, conceptual gaps, or weak use of appropriate techniques. The work tends toward the factual / derivative, or lacks sound development. Little evidence of capacity to reflect critically. Relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 30-39% Demonstrates inadequate subject knowledge. The work lacks coherence and evidence of capacity to reflect critically. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 20-29% Demonstrates seriously inadequate knowledge of the subject. The work contains minimal evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 10-19% The work is almost entirely lacking in evidence of knowledge of the subject. No evidence of awareness of relevant issues or theory. The quality of the relevant generic skills do not meet the requirements of the task. 0-9% The work presents information that is irrelevant and unconnected to the task. No evident awareness of appropriate principles, theories, evidence and techniques. CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? CORP 5065 – Community Work Based Project Individual Assignment Marking Sheet Student Name Student ID Overall Mark ___________% Moderated Mark ___________% CRITERIA YES NO PENALTY Submission deadline (is met) Report Format Word count (is indicated) Peer review form from group presentation TOTAL PENALTY Report Format (10%) (10 marks) The extent to which the assignment represents an effective report. This will be judged on: Appearance: Is a word count included at the end of the report? Is it within the specified amount? Is the text double spaced? Structure: Does the report follow the conventions of the format? Does it have a clear introduction, explaining how it answers the questions? Do the sections of the report develop ideas in a logical sequence? Are diagrams or other subsidiary information shown in appendices? Spelling and grammar: Are all words spelled correctly and is the meaning of sentences clear? Referencing: Have appropriate references been included in the report. Correct use of Harvard Referencing? Individual Report (40%) (40 marks) Has the student? Critically described his/her own role within the project team? Critically evaluated his/her own contribution to the project? Critically assessed the working relationships with other individuals involved within the project? Referencing: Have appropriate references been included in the report. Correct use of Harvard Referencing? Individual Report (40%) (40 marks) Has the student? Critically described his/her own role within the project team? Critically evaluated his/her own contribution to the project? Critically assessed the working relationships with other individuals involved within the project? Referencing: Have appropriate references been included in the report. Correct use of Harvard Referencing? Individual Report (40%) (40 marks) Has the student? Critically described his/her own role within the project team? Critically evaluated his/her own contribution to the project? Critically assessed the working relationships with other individuals involved within the project? Referencing: Have appropriate references been included in the report. Correct use of Harvard Referencing? Individual Report (40%) (40 marks) Has the student? Critically described his/her own role within the project team? Critically evaluated his/her own contribution to the project? Critically assessed the working relationships with other individuals involved within the project? Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor…………………… Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor…………………… Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor…………………… Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor…………………… Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor…………………… Critically reflected on how he/she will be able to apply what they have learnt as a result of project? Analysis of Decision Making Process(40%) (40 marks) Critically described the key decisions? Critically analysed the stages and strengths and weaknesses in the decision making process? Conclusion/Summary (10%) (10 marks) Critically commented on the effectiveness or otherwise of the outcome of the project? Date: Signature of Module Tutor……………………