4. Written assessment — Critical evaluation of a key research area in mobile computing Due date: 11pm Friday of Week 12 ASSIGNMENT Weighting: 20% 3 Length: 2,000-2,500 words Objectives This assessment item relates to the course learning outcomes numbers 5 and 6 as stated in the online course profile. Details You are to write a scholarly essay that critically evaluates findings from at least two journal publications in one of the following research areas; • Location based services and mobile platforms • Mobile security • Social implications of mobile computing You are not to write an essay on one of these topics. You are to critically reflect on the papers and then explain whether the papers did an adequate job of explaining what the purpose of the work was, collected sufficient evidence, and reached the right conclusions based on the evidence. You may use the following questions as a guide for critically evaluating the research papers. Is the research question or problem clearly stated and of significance? Does the research adequately cover the relevant existing research literature for the research question? What methodology is used in the research and is this adequately explained? Is there good agreement between the research question, the philosophical framework used, and the research methods? Are there any biases you can detect in the methods used in the study, or flaws in the logic or methods that undermine the results? Is the study ethical? Is the data collection and analysis appropriate? Is the research finding supported by the evidence? You should submit your critique online using the Moodle learning system. All sources must be properly referenced using Harvard style references. Use the following marking scheme to guide your critique. Written Assessment criteria – 20 marks Marking Sheet To be attached to your assignment NAME: _____________________________ COURSE: COIT20269 Overall Performance MARK / 20 Poor Good Excellent Mark Presentation - 3 Structure, grammar, spelling, referencing Poor structure, grammar, use of referencing and spelling Some problem No problems 0 1.5 1.5 2 2 3 Introductory arguments - 2 Well defined introduction to what critique is about Poorly introduced and defined At least two papers adequately covered Excellent introduction 0 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 2 Critique body - 12 For 2 journal papers: - Research questions identified - Methodology described - Analysis of conclusion discussed - Reflections on paper Synthesis of works into a critique of research area Poor summary, analysis, arguments and identification of issues, evaluation Some sections done poorly All sections done well 0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 12 Conclusion - 3 Summary well presented Logical conclusions derived Interpretation of scholarly works correct Argument presented within length guideline Poor summary, directions, evaluations, interpretations and conclusion Adequate Excellent 0 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 3 Deductions: TOTAL 20 General Comments