Assessment task 2- Annotated bibliography & mind map Evaluation Criteria— Criteria HD D C P F Comments Provides evidence of understanding and ability to apply concepts relating to the HF physical domain Evidence of high level understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Consistent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Frequent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply knowledge Limited evidence understanding & demonstrates some ability to apply concepts Lack of evidence of understanding and / or demonstration of ability to apply concepts e.g. anthropometrics (the size & shape of the body in the workplace), physical workload, workspace layout (i.e. control location etc.) Provides evidence of understanding and ability to apply concepts relating to the HF cognitive domain Evidence of high level understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Consistent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Frequent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Some evidence understanding & demonstrates some ability to apply concepts Lack of evidence of understanding and / or demonstration of ability to apply concepts e.g. perception, compatibility (i.e. does something work the way the user expects), display design, attention & workload Provides evidence of understanding and ability to apply concepts relating to the HF organisational domain Evidence of high level understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Consistent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Frequent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Some evidence understanding & demonstrates some ability to apply concepts Lack of evidence of understanding and / or demonstration of ability to apply concepts e.g. work organisation (i.e. work rosters, production imperatives etc.), environmental stress (i.e. thermal comfort, noise & other), function allocation (i.e. which bits human does & which bits are automated), task analysis (i.e. issues like the interplay between procedures & actual work), psycho-social issues (i.e. stuff related to the way people interact in work as part of a system) Provides evidence of understanding and ability to apply concepts from a systems design perspective Evidence of high level understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Consistent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Frequent evidence of understanding & demonstrates ability to apply concepts Some evidence understanding & demonstrates some ability to apply concepts Lack of evidence of understanding and / or demonstration of ability to apply concepts e.g. the issues covered in Module 1 (i.e. humans as components that interact with other parts of the system) Provides evidence of understanding the role that human factors have in accident causation Provides evidence of high level understanding of the role that human factors have in accident causation Consistent evidence of understanding of the role that human factors have in accident causation Frequent evidence of understanding of the role that human factors have in accident causation Some evidence understanding of the role that human factors have in accident causation Lack of evidence of understanding of the role that human factors have in accident causation e.g. here we are looking for evidence across your learning from Module 1 Demonstrates understanding and provides evidence base for human factors accident investigation practice Exhibits high level understanding demonstrated by the evidence base for practice Exhibits consistent understanding demonstrated by the evidence base for practice Frequent evidence of understanding demonstrated by the evidence base for practice Some evidence understanding demonstrated by the evidence base for practice Lack of evidence of understanding demonstrated by the evidence base for practice e.g. here we start to use learning from Module 2 but we should still see learning from Module 1 evidenced in this criterion Provides evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues Provides high level evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues Provides consistent evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues Provides frequent evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues Provides some evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues Lack of evidence of research into appropriate HF tools and methods applicable to the potential human factors issues e.g. here we want to see you use your learning from Module 2 but we should still see learning from Module 1 evidenced in this criterion Organisation Sequence is logical, ideas flow Sequence is logical, ideas flow most of the time Sequence is consistent, ideas flow most of the time Sequence is mostly consistent, ideas flow most of the time Sequence is inconsistent and /or ideas are scattered Written expression Consistently accurate grammar & spelling Infrequent grammar or spelling errors Occasional grammar or spelling errors Frequent grammar or spelling errors Significant errors in grammar or spelling Referencing Evidence of wide, high quality reading/ communication, accurate referencing throughout Evidence of wide reading/ communication, accurate referencing throughout Evidence of some further reading/ communication, accurate referencing throughout Evidence of some further reading/ communication, and in text & reference list mostly accurate Little evidence of further reading/ communication, and /or inadequate acknowledgement of sources Don’t forget to fully reference your work in bibliographies but include ‘in text’ referencing in mind map also Comments: