IBU5HRM: Assessment 3 Marking Criteria Rubric
Short Report – You are the International HRM Consultant writing this report to
Flextronics
STUDENT NAME:
CRITERIA
Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Fair (50 – 59%) Poor (<50%) MARK
Introduction
(10% of total mark)
☐ Excellent outline of
purpose, scope and
limitations; Clear and expertly
written organisation/order of
each section of the report
The case study and context
explained at an advanced
level. Excellent understanding
of the organisation.
(8-10 marks)
☐ Clear and purposeful
outline of purpose, scope
and limitations; Clear and
concise organisation/order
of each section of the report.
(7 marks)
☐ Clear and concise purpose,
scope and limitations;
Developed description of the
case study and understanding
of the context of the
organisation – case study.
Succinct organisation/order of
each section of the report.
(6 marks)
☐ Basic understanding of
purpose, scope and
limitations;
Basic outline of case study
and understanding of the
context of the organisation –
case study.
Reasonable organisation/order
of each section of the report.
(5 marks)
☐ No clear purpose, scope
or limitations or identification
of the case study
No clear understanding of
the context of the
organisation – case study.
No organisation/order of each
section of the report.
( 5 marks)
/10
Identification and critical
discussion of the issues in
this case –including
operations across
different countries,
customer & staffing
issues.
(20% of total mark)
☐ Report outlines the
organisational context and the
issues in the case study.
High level of interpretative and
analytical ability to critically
analyse literature.
(16-20 marks)
☐ Clear and concise
description of the
organisational context and
issues in the case study;
Evidence of comprehensive
critical analysis.
(14-15 marks)
☐ Ability to conceptualise and
describe the issues in the case
study;
Evidence of critical analysis of
the literature.
(12-13 marks)
☐ Basic ideas formulated to
link to the organisational
context and the issues in the
case study;
Fundamental theories and
concepts summarised.
Simple analysis of the literature.
(10-11 marks)
☐ No evidence of
understanding or evaluating
the issues in the case study.
No summary of main
theories and concepts;
No critical analysis of the
literature.
(<10 marks)
/20
Explain how HRM should
ensure the issues with
performance management
and training and
development are not
repeated taking into
consideration the
international environment.
(40% of total mark)
☐ Demonstrates outstanding
ability to evaluate international
performance management and
training and development.
High level of interpretative and
analytical ability to critically
analyse literature.
(32-40 marks)
☐ Demonstrates
thoroughly consistent ability
to evaluate international
performance management
and training and
development
Evidence of comprehensive
critical analysis.
(28-31 marks)
☐ Demonstrates consistent
ability to evaluate international
performance management and
training and development.
Evidence of critical analysis.
(24-27 marks)
☐ Demonstrates basic ability
to evaluate international
performance management and
training and development.
Displays basic information.
Simple analysis of the
literature.
(20-23 marks)
☐ No demonstrated ability
to evaluate international
performance management
and training and
development.
No critical analysis of the
literature.
(<20 marks)
/40
Conclusion and
Recommendation/s/
Solution/s and
Implementation Plan
Present your plan as an
International HRM
consultant to present to
the company/case study
(10% of total mark)
☐ An insightful and
comprehensive summary of
the report;
Outstanding capacity to make
recommendations for effective
solutions relative to the
identified issues and
implementation plan
exceptionally well developed.
(8-10 marks)
☐ Ability to make sound
evaluation of the report;
Good ability to make sound
recommendations relative to
the identified issues and
implementation plan very
well developed.
(7 marks)
☐ Above average ability to
summarise the report;
Sound recommendations
related to the identified issues
and implementation plan well
planned.
(6 marks)
☐ Reasonably clear summary
of the report;
Recommendations link well to
the identified issues and basic
implementation plan evident.
(5 marks)
☐ Conclusion does not
summarise the report;
No clear recommendations or
implementation plan.
(< 5 marks)
/10
Research and
Referencing, including at
least 15 contemporary
(beyond 2006) refereed
journal articles
(10% of total mark)
☐ Evidence of extensive
reading and research;
Relevant literature used
critically and analytically,
presenting a balance of
perspectives
Excellent application of
referencing throughout the
document and the reference
list.
(8-10 marks)
☐ Evidence of wide reading
and research;
Evidence of critical and
analytical use of relevant
literature;
Good application of
referencing throughout the
document and the reference
list.
(7 marks)
☐ Reading and research
beyond set minimum.
Use of relevant research to
support findings;
Reasonable application of
referencing throughout the
document and the reference
list.
(6 marks)
☐ Minimal reading and
research – basic 15
contemporary (beyond 2006)
refereed journal articles;
Limited use of relevant
research, demonstrating little
engagement with literature;
Average and sometimes
inconsistent application of
referencing with some errors
throughout the document and
the reference list.
(5 marks)
☐ Inadequate reading and
research – less than 15
contemporary (beyond
2006) refereed journal
articles;
Research is evident but is
inappropriate or irrelevant;
Numerous referencing
errors throughout the
document and the reference
list.
(< 5 marks)
/10
Format, Clarity,
Presentation and Proof-
reading
(10% of total mark)
☐ Outstanding presentation
thoroughly consistent with
short report format; report
style numbering well
presented; high standards in
writing academic style;
Excellent headings that
highlight the case study;
High facility with academic
genre, generic structure
relevant to topic;
Comprehensively accurate
grammar, punctuation and
spelling.
(8-10 marks)
☐ Presentation thoroughly
consistent with short report
format and academic style;
Excellent headings and
numbering in accordance
with short report format;
Consistent application of
academic genre, generic
structure relevant to topic;
Very accurate grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
(7 marks)
☐ Presentation consistent with
short report format, clear
numbering and academic
style; Good headings;
Good application of academic
genre, generic structure
relevant to topic;
Generally, good grammar,
punctuation and spelling.
(6 marks)
☐ Presentation adequate in
accordance with short report
format, but not fully consistent
with appropriate academic
style; Adequate headings;
Adequate application of
academic genre, generic
structure relevant to topic;
Some errors in grammar,
punctuation and/or spelling.
(5 marks)
☐ Not using short report
format; no short report
numbering; no structure; no
headings;
Inadequate application of
academic genre, generic
structure relevant to topic;
Unacceptable errors in
grammar, punctuation and or
spelling
(< 5 marks)
/10
Examiner: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
TOTAL
MARK
/100