Assessment 4& 5: The group presentation (15%) and report (20%). Early in the semester, you will form a group of up to 5 students (including you). Some groups may have fewer students depending on tutorial numbers. The presentations are due in week 11 or 12 of semester. In small classes it may be possible to fit all group presentations into Week 12.All reports are due in Week 12, regardless of which week you present. You are asked to form groups where: • There is a mix of males and females. • There is a mix of people from different cultures. • There is a mix of people from different courses. Being able to work in a diverse group is an excellent skill. It is also a great way to meet people you do not know and network. Your tutor reserves the right to change groups if he or she thinks they are too similar. Each group must choose a differentopportunity to explore based on their own research or from the unit content. The opportunity should be recent (max 3 years) and/or emerging. Your task is to research the opportunity and identify what entrepreneurial activities across the fields of entrepreneurship have developed and may develop into the future. The opportunity analysis should also include a review of challenges that exist for the opportunity across the fields. The fields that must be touched on include: Startup, Corporate and Social. A exploration of Technology, as a field or as a requirement of the opportunity should be included in the assignment. Suggested approach is to as follows: Each team member: • Individually each team member should identify and research an example of opportunities that they see existing. The source of opportunity should be based on your own interests; your research; business sectors you are aware of work in; extension from opportunities presented in the unit (in other words where you see them!) • Each group member should prepare a short one page brief to share with their team outlining the opportunity for exploration. The whole group: • Compare the findings from each team member’s analysis of their opportunities. You should have four or five opportunities to compare. • Select the opportunity that you wish to further explore as a group. • The group must develop an analysis of the opportunity and what potential entrepreneurial activity may emerge from it. This research will need to be supported by research and properly researched. • Explore the opportunity in the context of the various fields of entrepreneurship covered in the unit • Exploreother relevant theory and models about this field of entrepreneurship in particular or entrepreneurship in general and analyse how you’re the field may capitalise on this opportunity. • Draw conclusions about the particular characteristics of the opportunities and challenges with capitalizing on it in the fields of entrepreneurship. Your team must present your findings to the class in your allotted week in tutorial. Allotted week will depend on the size of the class. In large classes, presentations will start in Week 11, and Startup and Corporate teams will be expected to present first. In addition, you must write a report covering the same content. This is due in Week 12 regardless of when your team presents. Teams presenting in Week 11 have the advantage of getting feedback from their presentation before finalising the report. Teams presenting in Week 12 have the advantage of an extra week to prepare the presentation. The presentation and report should summarise what you have learned about your opportunity and the fields of entrepreneurship. A structure similar to this is suggested: • Opportunity overview • Key challenges with developing/further developing businesses for this opportunity • How the fields of entrepreneurship may view the opportunity you have chosen to study and set about capitalising on it, including any definitions you have found (should include examples of firms that could work on the opportunity. • Common patterns between the fields of entrepreneurship and any features that are distinctly different when examining the opportunity. • How the selected companies fit (or do not fit) other theories, models or frameworks. • Your conclusions Time / word limits • Presentation: 15 minutes + 5 minutes for questions (practice so you use the time wisely) • Report: 3000 words ± 1000 (excludes executive summary, references and appendices) [Write as much as, and no more than, you need to. Aim to be concise] You will need to be organised to complete this task effectively. A suggested timeline is below: Week Tasks 4 Finalise Groups (preferably earlier than Week 4) 5 Choose opportunities for exploration 6 Compare opportunities and select in group 7 - 9 Research and develop your analysis and application to the fields of entrepreneurship 10 Organise your findings for your presentation and report. Work out how you will tell the ‘story’ of your research and findings 11 & 12 Prepare your presentation and report Logistics • Email the slides to your tutor by the end of the day on which you present. • Bring a printout of your slides on the day (handout form, 3 per page) so your tutor can write notes as you present. • Bring a copy of the presentation marking guide (next page) with all team member names and student IDs filled in. • You cannot reschedule your group presentation time. If one group member is missing, the others must present without them. The marking guide for the presentation and marking rubricfor the report are provided on the following pages.   Marking Guide – ENT10001 group presentation. Due week 11 or 12 – 15% Group member 1: Student number: Group member 2: Student number: Group member 3: Student number: Group member 4: Student number: Group member 5: Student number: Opportunity presented: Presentation quality (30%) Presentation style and structure (15%) Clear voices, easy to understand, varied tone of voice Eye contact and body language - No notes!! Worked as a team, made good use of time NW P C D HD Presentation visuals and audio (15%) Visuals/audio supports the story effectively Visual content is appealing and engaging; is not distracting NW P C D HD Content (60%) Analysis of opportunity (20%) One example per team Depth of research on the opportunity Overview of how has been or can continue to be capitalised on Level of exploration of the opportunity NW P C D HD Analysis of fields of entrepreneurship (15%) Strengths and weaknesses of the field to capitalise on the opportunity identified Strategies for capitalising on opportunity explained NW P C D HD Other theories (10%) Intelligent use of theories / models in the assignment NW P C D HD Conclusions (15%) Conclusions are presented about the chosen field of entrepreneurship Conclusions are clearly based on evidence from analysis NW P C D HD The ‘wow factor’ (10%) Awarded based on clear engagement and interest of the audience throughout the whole presentation. Assessed, in part, through the Q&A Total Group mark Marking Guide – ENT10001 Group report on your chosen field of Entrepreneurship -20 % Grade High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not Pass Writing style and presentation (10%) • Visual appeal • Structure: executive summary, table of contents, headings, page numbers, matches assessment criteria • Accurate spelling and grammar. • Well-structured sentences and paragraphs (not too long, good use of punctuation) Meets all criteria at an outstanding standard Meets all criteria at a high standard Meets all criteria at an acceptable standard or most criteria at a high standard with only a few lapses Meets most criteria at an acceptable standard, but below expectations in some. Does not meet the majority of the criteria and those that are met, are at minimum acceptable standard. Opportunity identification (30%) • Identification of opportunity • Evidence of how the opportunity has developed • Supporting information on the impact of the opportunity on society (i.e. social, economic, environment) • High quality sources Pick out the most significant elements Opportunity is thoroughly applied to clearly illustrate its “promise” to the marketplace. Significant elements are highlighted and well chosen Opportunity is applied well to illustrate its “promise” to the marketplace. Significant elements are highlighted and there is little unnecessary detail. Opportunity is applied to illustrate its “promise” to the marketplace and mostly well supported. May include some unnecessary/distracting detail. Opportunity is applied, but in a superficial manner and lacking supporting explanations. Significant elements are not well highlighted. Does not properly support or explain the “promise” of the opportunity Application of Opportunity to the fields of entrepreneurship (40%) • Identification of how the opportunity is being capitalised on main strengths • Identification of major strengths and weaknesses of the field to capture the opportunity • Strategies used to overcome weaknesses Strengths, weaknesses and strategies are accurately identified with clear supporting explanations of how each field is working on the opportunity Great judgement grouping similar characteristics for conciseness Strengths, weaknesses and strategies are accurately identified with supporting explanations of how each field is working on the opportunity Good judgement shown in similar characteristics for conciseness Strengths, weaknesses and strategies are identified, mostly with supporting explanations May provide too much detail rather than concise summaries. Describes opportunity screen findings with minimal focus on emphasising strengths, weaknesses and strategies. Does not relate examples to Opportunity Screen or relates them in a way that shows incorrect understanding of the model. Conclusions (10%) • Most significant challenges with the opportunity • Reflect on the differences between the fields of entrepreneurship Concisely and logically draws the analysis work into deep insights about the fields of entrepreneurship. Draws the analysis work into good, clear insights about the fields of entrepreneurship. Conclusions build fairly clearly on the analysis and contain some good insights about the fields of entrepreneurship. Conclusions are presented but not consistently built on analysis and/or insights may be superficial. Omitted or not in any way linked to analysis Correct use of references (10%) • References used are relevant to content • Citation and reference format follows Swinburne standard • Citation matches references Extensive use of relevant theory, all referenced in correct format. Good use of relevant theory, all referenced in correct format. Good use of relevant theory, with the occasional errors in formatting. Correct referencing, but limited use / not relevant to content OR references relevant but often incorrectly formatted. No references or majority incorrectly formatted OR references are irrelevant to content.