HAFIZ MAQBOOL AHMED S5026985 REVIEW OF LITERATURE “REVIEW OF INVASIVE WEED PROGRAMS IN AUSTRALIA: CASE STUDY BULWER - MORETON ISLAND” (7181ENV) APPLIED RESEARCH PROJECT Dr. Peter Davey MASTER OF ENVIRONMENT Review of Literature History shows that weeds which are hostile species and non-native create problems such as economic, environmental and social. The key factors in their wide spreads are change of technology, trade and change of land system. It has now become the global problem which holds the worsen condition like farm divisions, amenity migration, foraging plot and new management regimes by people who hardly know the agriculture“Klepeis, Gill, & Chisholm, 2009”. A research has been conducted about the discovery of good sheep’s wool, immigrant’s arrival amenity and how they are influence and how to manage worst weeds of the country called as serrated tussock (Nassellatrichotoma). Discussions with government officials, community-based conservation group and property owners, cultural expose, Land care organizational and financial barricades to the regulator of the hostile grass. Some of portion which goes to the minor assets and high bulk density individuals it improves the capacity to manage the serrated tussock to control the grass it will be better result if the livestock is fewer but if the population is more than it is controlled by chemically and mechanically But roughly 65% people who are belonging to this very short time put their little effort to control the weeds“Klepeis, Gill, & Chisholm, 2009”. In addition, most the people who have part time or full time status or usually the new in this field their thoughts and background about the nature and farm is totally varied and their primary income do not come from the land. Mostly rural areas of the Australia now have the sceneries of amenity and reduced capacity with declining social capital; organize a reaction to rural zone ecological difficulties“Klepeis, Gill, & Chisholm, 2009”. The major threat for biodiversity globally are the weeds “Williams & West, 2000; Weber, 2003; Groves et al., 2005 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. They have the necessities of resources such as nutrients and light and they compete with the plants and in result they cause in reduction of the native plants because in the presence of weeds the native plants cannot grow better “Williams & West, 2000; Groves et al., 2005 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Although in some circumstances where specific weeds are beneficial ‘substitute’ or bridging habitation in ruined systems, overall weeds can adapt those habitat feature according to the place for animal which are native, some with direct affected by the poison “Williams & West, 2000 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Weeds have a variety of cost-effective influences, including reduced ecosystem services and increased management costs “Williams & West 2000; Groves et al., 2005 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. In the high area of conservation value the weeds are the key danger to biodiversity. Unluckily, individuals may be involuntarily dispersing and when they are visited different areas the weed seeds are attached with their cloths. Data shows that seeds of weeds can translocate with other places with the clothing. In one or more countries in Europe a sum of 287 of the types are recorded as foreigners, 211 have naturalized outlandish plants in Australia,156 are invasive kinds/harmful weeds in North America, 97 are foreign types in India, in China disturbing species are 33 and 5 are confirmed intruders in Africa“Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. Hikers’ cloths can carry the seeds determined space of 13 km, but the people who travel in buses, planes, cars, train, and boats can carry the weed seeds much long distance. Many factors are involved in seed dispersal like the type of clothing, the material from which cloth is made of, the location and numbers of the seeds and seed traits such as attachment structures and adhesive, these are all effect. on the Areas which are specific for tourists using is increasing including popular protected areas, weeds are the great threat for remote regions of biological attacks from which are carried on clothing“Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. Travelling and inert restoration are between the rare activities of human allowed in many secure parts “Castley et al., 2009; Newsome et al., 2013 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. the horse riding is one activity in developed countries where it has become the cultural leisure “Landsberg et al., 2001; Newsome et al., 2004, 2008; Nimmo& Miller, 2007 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Unluckily, riding on horses can have a sort of adverse ecological effects including crushing of vegetation and soils, nutrient addition via urine and dung, altering hydrology via dispersal weed seeds destruction of rivers systems “Whinam et al., 1994; Nimmo& Miller, 2007; Pickering & Hill, 2007; Newsome et al., 2008; Pickering et al., 2010 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Some other leisure activities has some other effects “Liddle 1997; Pickering et al., 2010; Newsome et al., 2013 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013” containing dispersal seeds of weeds on clothing and vehicles “Pickering & Mount, 2010 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Horse riding can disperse seed on hooves, fur, equipment, riders and in feedstuff and as goes in droppings “Whinam et al., 1994; Weaver & Adams, 1996; Campbell & Gibson, 2001; Wells &Lauenroth, 2007; Quinn et al., 2008; Pickering & Mount, 2010 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. Feasible seeds in horse droppings could raise and germinate along trails, tracks and field areas, where it may extent promote into contiguous natural zones “Newsome et al., 2008; Pickering & Mount, 2010; Quinn et al., 2010 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2013”. The spreading and great quantity of invasive species has influenced by climate. With management practices the invasive plants can shift and in response the climate might need to move by the habitat suitability. The researchers recommend that Baccharishalimifolia (groundsel bush) is dropped in plenty in Australia with a group of control organic agents which are introduced last past 50 years“Sims-Chilton, Zalucki, & Buckley,2010”. While there is a hypothesis that a big reason of their decline is the biological control, that long-term amendment in the favorability for groundsel bush has changed growth condition due to the climate throughout its Australian range. There is a prediction that with the use of bioclimatic modeling practice (CLIMEX), what may occur to the upcoming spreading of this species. The scientist found a significant decline at twenty nine (29) locations in the favorability for development of Baccharishalimifolia over the past 50 years in Australia“Sims-Chilton, Zalucki, & Buckley, 2010”. Under the prediction of future climate scenario IPCC (increase in temperature and decrease in rainfall), the favorability for growing of B. halimifolia will remain to fall in the state of Queensland and its scattering may move extra south Victoria and into New South Wales“Sims-Chilton, Zalucki, & Buckley, 2010”. An expensive process which is called Biological control, however in mostly cases the whole advantage to ratio of cost is quite extraordinary “Page and Lacey, 2006cited by Sims-Chiltonet al., 2010”. The researchers and funding bodies would deliver a more precise measure of achievement in evaluation of biological control after can help to inform current programs. It has been observed a post agents release rapidly for collapse of weed population, when it can generally be capable straight to the agents for biological control “Room et al., 1981 cited by Sims-Chilton et al., 2010”. The neotropical rust Diabolecubensiswhich wasintroduced as a biological control agent controls the weed Mimosa pigra during the period 1996–1999 in the Northern Territory. In 2011, on M. pigra plants, first D. cubensis was noticed at the Daly river floodplains and FinnissRiver. In 2012, the fungus was also noticed on the Adelaide River floodplains and Mary“Burrows, Lukitsch, & Liberato, 2012”. Giant sensitive plant or Mimosa which is called Mimosa pigra L. (Fabaceae) is a flowering shrub, which can spread a height of 3–6 m, and has as noticeable characteristic narrowly lance late leaflets that bend together when injured or touched and at night “Lonsdale et al., 1989 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. It is a hostile harmful weed, listed among 100 of the “World’s Worst” intruders in the database of global intruders (http://www.issg.org/database/species/ecology.asp?si=41&fr=1&sts=sss“Burrows et al., 2012”. There is an estimation from the Department of Land Resource Management (DLRM), that mimosa has diseased 140 000 ha of flood plains in Kununurra, Western Australia the Northern Territory “Boustead, 2009 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. it has been spotted in Proserpine on the central Queensland coast in 2001 Outside the Northern Territory“Walden et al., 2004 cited by Burrows et al., 2012” and in 2009 eradication is being managed in both areas“Lloyd and Vinnicombe, 2010 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. TheNeotropics where the Mimosa pigra (mimosa) is originated and it is believed to have been hosted to Darwin, Northern Territory, in the late XIX century “Miller and Lonsdale, 1987 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. In the early 1950s on the Adelaide River a large infestation was discovered, about 100 km south of Darwin, and in the Northern Territory it has since extent to the coastal floodplains of certain of the leading river systems. Within northern Australia, Mimosa plants have modified to a number of habitats, becoming a severe weed in a wet-dry environment with a least of 750 mm of yearly rainfall “Lonsdale et al., 1989 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. Mimosa forms impenetrable monotypic stands, thick frequently spanning over numerous thousands of hectares, riparian, aquatic, outcompeting vegetation in sedge land, paper bark (Melaleuca spp.) and monsoon woodland communities “Lonsdale et al., 1989 cited by Burrows et al., 2012”. Firstly, population genetics structure of invasive alien plant species and secondly, the intraspecific taxonomy is two things which are vital for the programs of biological control “Gaskin et al., 2011cited by Barker, Paterson, & Howis, 2015”. In recent times, inherited practices are used to assist know invasion pasts and to clarify the genomic arrangement of alien population of invasive plant “Gaskin et al., 2011 cited by Barker, Paterson, & Howis, 2015”. Integrated pest management strategies are the best ways to controls or suppressions of pest populations. Though, integrated control selections and full factorial field experiments of all sole for a pest species would be prohibitively time consuming and expensive. In streamlining the decision-making process have great worth which Approaches to permit the vast range of management “Shea, Sheppard, & Woodburn, 2006”. Different factors effect on the exploration of the ecological and social on the amenity migration, the people in urban areas and people to rural due to their differentiated culture and environmental quality. “Moss, 2006 cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”is getting growing responsiveness in policy arenas and research “ Argent et al., 2007; Buxton et al., 2006; Loeffler and Steinicke, 2007; McGranahan, 1999; Moss, 2006a ; Stewart, 2002cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. Migration of rural people from metropolitan to non-metropolitan areas, growth and terrestrial subdivision of rural people in australia is linked directly “Buckley et al., 2006; Bunker and Houston, 2003 ; Burnley and Murphy, 2004 cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. These ‘mixing of landholders and land uses new’ countryside landscapes have an increasingly dissimilar. The proportion of populations who are not counted in the customary category of permanent grazer is developing, and ‘rural’ lifestyle in a rural context majority of new comers – living off the land worth – rather than consuming its amenity“Klepeis et al., 2009”. New multifunctional landscapes of are not stationary. The research showed in political ecology and change of land system study the variations are often the outcome of a compound web of natural forces and human. The dynamic changes are always affected by stochastic procedures and non-linear and, such as market shifts or policy “Klepeis and Laris, 2006 ; GLP, 2005 cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. Fitting parameters in Australia for groundsel bush for the potential distribution iteratively till they greatest exact the recognized dispersal of groundsel bush. A research has been conducted for the dispersal conforms to present distribution andassembly records in Australia, though, the plant seems to have the capacity to grow further Victoria and Tasmania, north into Queensland south into southern New South Wales“Sims-Chilton et al., 2010”. The ecological effects which are explored by the research on rural transitions,including biodiversity and change in habitat, increased fire hazard, harassment of wildlife and on hydrologic regimes it has negative impacts “Hansen et al., 2005; Maestas et al., 2002 ; Moss, 2006; Wacker and Kelly, 2004cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. While known as a vital zone of analysis slight research explores the influence of land subdivision on the spread of invasive and amenity migration “Hobbs et al., 2006 cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. In safe areas weeds can have essential economic influences, includingdeclines in the ecosystem services andincreased management costs in secure area “Williams and West, 2000; Sindenet al., 2004; Williams et al., 2010; McDougall et al., 2011 ; Stohlgrenet al., 2013cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. For example, the cost of the weeds controlling in the normal environment in 2001–02 in Australia was 43% was used for weed control in secure areas which predicted at approximately $AU19.6 M “Sindenet al., 2004cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. weed invasions degrade ecology services include movement along rivers and reduced water value and, soil environment changes due to changes to fire regimes, weeds changing chemistry of soils and biota and due to attacks by more combustible species “Csurhes and Edwards, 1998; Weber, 2003 ; Groves et al., 2005 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. On the globally distribution weeds are the major threat including in safe parts “Williams and West, 2000; Weber, 2003; Groves et al., 2005; Pickering and Hill, 2007; Pyšek and Richardson, 2010; Williams et al., 2010; Vilàet al., 2011 ; Stohlgrenet al., 2013cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. As compared to the native vegetation, they have features that make them more feasible, including great altitudes offset growth rates, seed production, tolerance of anthropogenic disruption and the capacity to develop under extensive range of ecological circumstances “Weber, 2003; Groves et al., 2005 ; Pauchardet al., 2009cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. These new characteristics combines with new habitats can result in changing the biodiversity and weeds take place on native plant “Csurhes and Edwards, 1998; Williams and West, 2000; Groves et al., 2005 ; Pyšek and Richardson, 2010 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. There is big source of weed carrying seeds in protected areas by the visitor’s clothes (Pickering and Mount, 2010cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014). For instance, seeds carried by the people clothing who visit the national park of Australia are 73% and researchshows that they carry the seeds in tons quantity each year “Pickering et al., 2011cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. Peoplein protected areas can still carry large amounts of seeds “Chownet al., 2012 ; Ware et al., 2012cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. Astonishingly, few people may spread the weed seeds intentionally, with 2 tourists found intentionally spreading Hordeumvulgare (Barley) seeds as they climbed on an Island called Deception, which was off the Antarctic Peninsula “ Darby, 2012 cited by Ansong & Pickering, 2014”. As the conditions are altering environment-human linked to directly migration of amenity and managing the invasive, it is creating new challenges. Invasive kinds with mainlyecological and communalinfluences have received fewer cares than those with important economic influences “Agtrans, 2005cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. The responsibility ofgovernment weeds programs and primary industries agencies, both often accept that the landowner is a commercial worker with services, inspiration, and gear to tool the proper control procedures “Agriculture & Resource Management Council, 2000 cited by Klepeis et al., 2009”. The problem of disrupts ecosystems and losses to biodiversity are caused by the spread of pest that is called problem of trans-boundary. Social study into, and strategy development for, weeds has abstracted their regulator as a problem fronting discreteowners, rather than as a combined act problem. In the case of Nassellatrichotoma“serrated tussock), injurious weed that is prevalent in states of southeastern Australia, government staff and landowners are intensely aware that this weed is a common problem“Graham, 2013”. Examination of semi-structured discussions exposed that agency staff and property-owners believe that 3 ways available for societies to attain collectively greater weed control, which are involve providing support,sharing information and applying pressure. Future policy development is provided by these pathways. Firstly, future policies could use the outcomes to make slightchanges to the way data is spread, funding is enforcement and provided is managed. On the other hand, upcoming strategies could be progressed to recognize worthy management of farms, boost improved relations among fellow citizen and figure on the communal capital that exists in Land care clusters“Graham, 2013”. Fifty sorts of parasites are belonging on the meddlesome weed leaves in the Queensland forests. In nearby lantana forests, three enchanting bugs with far reaching host degrees are co-attacking. The privet parasite Brevipalpusobovatus; the thorny pear arachnid bug Tetranychusdesertorumand the passionvine vermin Brevipalpusphoenicis. Privet parasite was open at seventy five percent of the goals tried, even on isolated plants critical inside national parks “Walter, 1999 cited by Curnow, Bavas, Symmons, & Laurie, 2011”. In the state of Queensland, The owner groups are worried about a highly hostile weed which will soon spread in whole Australia and covers all the pedestrian paths and national parks. Grader grass which is a noxious plant and being spread due to the big wet season“Curnow, Bavas, Symmons, & Laurie, 2011”. In the north and its Centre of Australia, buffle grass is widespread and common.It is regular in many widely utilized rustic frameworks and considerable increments in domesticated animals conveying limits have been endorsed to it “Chudleigh and Bramwell, 1996; Hall 2000; Friedel,et al., 2006cited by Grice, Friedel, Marshall, & Van Klinken, 2012”. Buffle grass is used to restore for those lands which are eroded due over grazing “Keetch, 1981cited by Grice, Friedel, Marshall, & Van Klinken, 2012”. There are no dependable, point by point national information that buffel grass is sown in how much land area or over what region it has naturalized yet it is plainly financially vital “Hall 2000; Friedelet al., 2006cited by Grice, Friedel, Marshall, & Van Klinken, 2012”. The discovery in Moreton Cove of C.taxifolia was bigger in both Stream Port Hacking andConjola recommends that attack of C. taxifolia into mild Australia has not included an expansion in mass, despite the fact that it is conceivable that insufficient time has passed for substantial size to advance. There has all the earmarks of being a nearby hereditary connection between C.taxifolia from Lake Conjola and Moreton Bay “Murphy and Schaffelke, 2003 cited by Schaffelkeet al., 2002”. In addition, the related size extents of C. taxifolia stolon remove crosswise over in 2 regions backings that knowledge. Tropical area of Queensland is the sensible wellspring in Port Hacking of C.taxifolia “Schaffelkeet al., 2002”. Likewise, the tinier stolon size breadths recommend in Port Hacking a substitute root than C. taxifolia ofMoreton Bay. Its unique presence of a development in C. taxifolia size in the midst of interruption into southeastern Australia shows up contrastingly in connection to the undeniable addition in C. taxifolia size in the midst of assault into the sea of Mediterranean“Joussonet al., 2000 cited by Wright, 2005”. There were on a very basic level greater mass of fundamental fronds and stolons, and biomass/m2 at both meddling regions divergedfrom in Port Hacking and Moreton Bay appeared differently in relation to Lake Conjola“Wright, 2005”. Bibliography Ansong, M., & Pickering, C. (2013). A global review of weeds that can germinate from horse dung. Ecological Management & Restoration, 14(3), 216-223. doi: 10.1111/emr.12057 Ansong, M., & Pickering, C. (2014). Weed seeds on clothing: a global review. Journal of environmental management, 144, 203-211. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.026 Barker, N. P., Paterson, I., & Howis, S. (2015). “Barcoding” and ISSR data illuminate a problematic infraspecific taxonomy for Chrysanthemoides monilifera (Calenduleae; Asteraceae): Lessons for biocontrol of a noxious weed. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 61, 541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.07.021 Burrows, N. J., Lukitsch, B. V., & Liberato, J. R. (2012). Rediscovery of the rust Diabole cubensis, released as a classical biological control agent against the invasive weed Mimosa pigra in Australia. Australasian Plant Disease Notes U6 - ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rediscovery+of+the+rust+Diabole+cubensis%2C+released+as+a+classical+biological+control+agent+against+the+invasive+weed+Mimosa+pigra+in+Australia&rft.jtitle=Australasian+Plant+Disease+Notes&rft.au=Burrows%2C+N+J&rft.au=Lukitsch%2C+B+V&rft.au=Liberato%2C+J+R&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.pub=Springer+Netherlands&rft.eissn=1833-928X&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=175&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs13314-012-0077-3&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=2012_13314_7_1_77¶mdict=en-US U7 - Journal Article, 7(1), 171-175. doi: 10.1007/s13314-012-0077-3 Curnow, D., Bavas, J., Symmons, D., & Laurie, A. (2011). Weed pest found in national park: Landcare groups in Queensland say they are worried that a highly invasive weed could soon spread across Australia, taking over national parks and pastoral land. Graham, S. (2013). Three cooperative pathways to solving a collective weed management problem. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 20(2), 116-129. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2013.774681 Grice, A. C., Friedel, M. H., Marshall, N. A., & Van Klinken, R. D. (2012). Tackling Contentious Invasive Plant Species: A Case Study of Buffel Grass in Australia. Environmental Management, 49(2), 285-294. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9781-6 Klepeis, P., Gill, N., & Chisholm, L. (2009). Emerging amenity landscapes: Invasive weeds and land subdivision in rural Australia. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 380-392. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.006 Shea, K., Sheppard, A., & Woodburn, T. (2006). Seasonal Life-History Models for the Integrated Management of the Invasive Weed Nodding Thistle Carduus nutans in Australia. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43(3), 517-526. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01160.x Sims-Chilton, N. M., Zalucki, M. P., & Buckley, Y. M. (2010). Long term climate effects are confounded with the biological control programme against the invasive weed Baccharis halimifolia in Australia. Biological Invasions, 12(9), 3145-3155. doi: 10.1007/s10530-010-9705-z Walter, D. E. (1999). Cryptic inhabitants of a noxious weed: Mites (Arachnida: Acari) on Lantana camara L. invading forests in Queensland. Australian Journal of Entomology, 38(3), 197-200. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00101.x Wright, J. T. (2005). Differences between native and invasive Caulerpa taxifolia: a link between asexual fragmentation and abundance in invasive populations. Marine Biology, 147(2), 559-569. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-1561-5