BMA701314 Semester -11_201574 Individual Report Essay Rubric Student: Criteria HD (High Distinction) DN (Distinction) 70% - 79% CR (Credit) 60% - 69% PP (Pass) 50% - 59% NN (Fail) 0% - 49% 90% – 100% 80% - 89% Explained the objectives&context of the change topic & link to presentation topic /44 Provides an excellent rationale and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Provides a comprehensive description and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Provides a very gooddescription and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Provides a good description and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Provides an adequate description and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Provides an inadequate and/or limited description and explanation of the significance of the change topic. Analyse, assess, evaluate and apply relevant and quality literature to support the change topic and methodologycontemporary challenges, opportunities and strategies using Organisational Change and Development theories, concepts and interventions. /1035marks Excellent use of quality and relevant literature in an integrated mannerthat provides critical analysis and clear evidence to support change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation.Focussed and comprehensive description, critical analysis and application of a wide range of appropriate Organisational Change and Development theories, concepts and interventions. Comprehensive description, analysis and application of a range of appropriate Organisational Change and Development theories, concepts and interventions.Excellent use of quality and relevant literature that provides critical analysis and clear evidence to support change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation. Very good use of quality and relevant literature that provides clear analysis and evidence to support change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation.Detailed description, analysis and application of appropriate Organisational Change and Development theories, concepts and interventions. Good use of mostly quality and relevant literature that provides analysis and evidence to support change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation.Most issues described, analysed and applied using some Organisational Change and Development theories, concepts and interventions. Competent use of some quality and relevant literature that provides some analysis and evidence to support change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation.Some analysis and description of key issues using some theory and practice. Limited use of quality and relevant literature to provide support for some aspects of change diagnosis, implementation, communication and evaluation.Partial analysis and description of issues with limited use of either theory or practice. Provide a four (4) page (maximum) outline of the ‘change project’ including: diagnosis (including data collection), planning, implementation and evaluation. /88 Comprehensive outline of change project that effectively addresses the elements of diagnosis, planning implementation and evaluation with clarity and precision. Outline completely consistent with objectives and context. Very good outline of change project that effectively addresses the elements of diagnosis, planning implementation and evaluation with clarity and precision. Outline largely consistent with objectives and context. Good outline of change project that broadly addresses the elements of diagnosis, planning implementation and evaluation with some clarity and precision. Outline generally consistent with objectives and context. Sound outline of change project that generally addresses the elements of diagnosis, planning implementation and evaluation. Outline somewhat consistent with objectives and context. Unclear and/or incomplete outline of change project that does not clearly address the elements of diagnosis, planning implementation and evaluation. Outline inconsistent with objectives and context. Conclusion /43 Draws insightful conclusions based onfromevidence based literature (and other relevant references) andexcellent analysis of the change project.and use of Organisational Change and Development concepts. Draws valid conclusions based onfrom evidence based literature (and other relevant references) and very good analysis of the change project.analysis and use of Organisational Change and Development concepts. Draws sound conclusions from relevant literature and good analysis of the change projectbased on analysis and use of Organisational Change and Development concepts Draws some appropriate conclusions from satisfactory literature and competent analysis of the change project. Draws partial and/or incomplete conclusions based on literature and limited analysis of the change project Quality of writing, number (minimum 12), quality and integration of referencesWrite using the language of Organisational Change and Development in an essay format /7410 marks Consistently Excellently communicated in fluent writing using clear, concise and accurate expression and logical structure. Very high quality use and integration of relevant references Consistently used Organisational Change and Development language. High quality and consistent referencing. Well cCommunicated in fluent writing style using clear,and accurate expression and logical structure. Mostly quality use and integration of relevant references. Limited errors in referencing. Mostly used Organisational Change and Development language. Satisfactory to good communication with mostlyPredominantly used clear, coherent expression but with some lack of clarity, spelling and structure.in written communication. Generally effective use of at least minimum number of academic references. Some errors in referencingSome use of Organisational Change and Development language. Lack of clear and effective communication including structure, expression, spelling and lack of claritySome use of coherent expression and structure in written communication. Partial use of Organisational Change and Development language.Ineffective use or lack of academic references. Poor referencing. Assessment Submission Rules: Rule 1: Failure to adhere to assignment instructions (e.g. word count) will incur an automatic penalty of 20% of the available marks. Rule 2: Failure to acknowledge sources may lead to an overall fail grade for the assessment Rule 3: Incoherent English language expression will lead to a fail grade or reduced marks if it inhibits understanding of written material. Cite at least five (5) academic sources and adhere to referencing conventions 5 marks Accurate and consistent referencing. Cites at least 5 academic sources. Mostly accurate referencing. Cites at least 5 academic sources. Reasonably accurate referencing. Cites at least 5 academic sources. Some referencing conventions followed. Fewer than 5 academic sources cited. TOTAL MARKS /30 Assessment Submission Rules: Rule 1: Failure to acknowledge sources will lead to an overall fail grade. Rule 2: Incoherent English writing will lead to a fail grade. Writing that is difficult to understand will result in reduced marks due to the impediment it creates in determining whether or not the student has met the above standards. Feedback: Feedback: Grade: TOTAL MARKS /350