Criterion Weight 0 - 49 50 - 59 60 - 69 70 - 79 80 - 100 Project assessment and reporting 25% Inadequate assessment with unclear or incorrect status report. Basic status assessment and report with some support from the case facts. Reader gains solid understanding of the project status through focused analysis accurately highlighting the issues in the case. Reader can easily understand the project statusand future direction, through clear reporting and detailed future reporting plan. Rich understanding of the project, clearly and professionally displayed, with detailed, professional plan for future direction. Behaviour analysis 25% No behaviour analysis or inconsistent findings. Lack of clarity in future requirements. Some logical analysis of behaviour. Future requirements could be more convincing or more directly linked to the situation. Reader gains solid understanding of the behavioural environment through focused analysis, with future directions specified clearly. Reader can easily understand the behavioural environment and the future direction. Well supported analysis and findings. Rich understanding of the scenario environment with compelling case for the future direction. Creative and innovative approach. Writing structure and flow 10% Logic, flow & use of language difficult. Many spelling or grammar errors. Layout is adequate with acceptable flow and use of language. Some misspellings or grammatical errors. Overall presentation is easy to digest; language succinct and well chosen. Few errors. Good presentation, content and language. Easy to read and draw conclusions. Overall style and use of language encourages ease of comprehension and insightful conclusions. Layout and quality 5% Layout is confusing. Little use of text styling or poor formatting. Acceptable layout and text elements. Good layout and use of text styles, adding to understanding. Excellent text formatting and layout, enhancing readability. Professional formatting, overall appearance and style. Multimedia and images 5% Little or no use of media or images. Adequate use of supporting media. Good use of media supporting the topic well. Good use of supporting graphics or charts to augment understanding. Supported by creative, innovative graphics and charts used well. Recommend-ations and conclusions 10% Missing or irrelevant conclusion and recommendations, with no impact. Could be more convincing or more directly linked to the presented information. Well-written conclusion and recommendations, summarises report effectively. Conclusion and recommendations enhance the report, showing good understanding. Insightful recommendations and conclusion, inspiring the reader and supporting the overall report well. Referencing 10% References missing, or not adequately supporting the report. Most relevant aspects of the report adequately referenced with credible resources. Good range of high quality resources as supporting evidence, correctly referenced. Report thoroughly supported by authoritative sources, well referenced. Comprehensive coverage with wide range of high-quality sources, thoroughly referenced. Planning and reflection 10% Little or no planning or reflection evident. An adequate project plan with some evidence of reflection. A well-documented project plan and thoughtful reflection. A comprehensive project plan with a reflection showing some insight. Professional project plan, with reflection showing deep insight. Score 100% Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction