Marking criteria for the assignment 3 for CIS8004 Student Name: Student #: Marking criteria Mark Awarded ACTIVITIES 1. The report should be well structured and cover at least the following topics: - Structure o Properly formatted well presented business report o Executive Summary o Recommendations o Conclusion - References o 10 References at least o Relevant citations within the report Marker Feedback: 2. Descriptions and justifications of the solution design; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 3. Description strategies of Customer Journey; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 4. Description and justification of Information Architecture; /8 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: 5. Technology architecture; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 6. Work breakdowns and work package decomposition; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (4 – 6 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 10 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (11 – 15 points) Marker Feedback: /15 7. Sequencing of activities; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 5 points) /10 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (6 – 7 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (8 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: 8. Timelines; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (17 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 9. Refine list of CSF; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback: /10 10. Pre-implementation plan and strategies; and 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 n Post-implementation plan and strategies . 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback: /8 11. Quality and relevance of Conclusion(s)/recommendations 1: Poor (poor conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (0- 1 points) 2: Average (weak conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (2 points) 3: Good (good conclusion, no grammar and spelling mistakes, acceptable expression) (3 – 4 points) 4: Excellent (great conclusion, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors) (5 points) Marker Feedback: /5 12. Less late submission as per USQ/BELA policies and procedures Total /100 OVERALL COMMENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________