CRITERIA FAIL PASS CREDIT DISTINCTION HIGH DISTINCTION Evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. (15%) No, or very little, evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Minimal evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Moderate evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Comprehensive evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Rich and convincing evidence of identifying an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance (15%) No, or very little, evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Minimal evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Moderate evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Comprehensive evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Rich and convincing evidence of explaining an indicative range of theoretical perspectives pertaining to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Utilisation of at least four references, sourced from appropriate readings for weeks 3-7. (20%) No, or little utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Adequate but superficial utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Some thoughtful utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Excellent and insightful utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Impressive, insightful and original utilisation of appropriate references demonstrated. Utilisation of at least two appropriate references sourced independently from journals recommended in Learning Resources. (20%) No, or little utilisation of independently sourced references. References not appropriate. Adequate but superficial utilisation of independently sourced references. References tangentially appropriate. Some thoughtful utilisation of independently sourced references. References appropriate. Excellent and insightful utilisation of independently sourced references. References important. Impressive, insightful and original utilisation of independently sourced references. References highly significant. Identification of critical issues relating to processes and practices concerning organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. (15%) No identification of critical issue relating to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Adequate but superficial identification of critical issue relating to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Some insightful identification of critical issue relating to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Excellent and insightful identification of critical issue relating to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Impressive, insightful and original identification of critical issue relating to organisational structures / people management / marketing / finance. Structure, clarity of expression (grammar and spelling) and referencing. (15%) Poor organisation of argument / ideas; poor expression / poor referencing. Satisfactory but with difficulties in communicating ideas. Basically well written. Very well written with few minor mistakes. Excellent writing, which demonstrates careful revision so as to avoid minor mistakes. • Marking criteria and standards