CNA151 Assessment 3 - Team Health Promotion Project – Reflection - Overall Weighting 25% Criteria HD DN CR PP NN Your reflection: Your reflection: Your reflection: Your reflection: Your reflection: Reflect on your contribution to the team process (30% weighting)  Using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection presents relevant facts and insightful observations that describe the event  Key aspects of the team activity are identified and their relationship to future practice explained  Using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection presents relevant facts and key observations that describe the event  Key aspects of the team activity are identified and their relationship to future practice explained  Using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection presents relevant facts and uses specific details that describe the event  Identifies the key aspects of the situation as they relate to future practice  Using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection presents relevant facts and records personal observations using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection  States the key aspects of the situation  Has little evidence of using Driscoll’s Model of Reflection and in depth reflection  Outlines what occurred  Includes some material irrelevant to reflection Reflect on the contribution of the team activities to your understanding of health promotion principles and practice. (30% weighting)  Critically analyses the tasks undertaken and processes followed for health promotion practice  Shows deep insight when considering your thoughts and feelings  Presents an in depth analysis of what worked/what didn’t work in your team by drawing on relevant theory  Identifies ways to improve health promotion practice in light of this team experience  Presents strong connections between the team work and your thoughts and feelings  Analyses the significance of the experience drawing on relevant theory  Generalises your experiences to wider health promotion practice  Identifies and explains your thoughts and feelings  Analyses the experience by looking at more than one angle and using relevant theory  Partially analyses the experience from a narrow perspective  Uses concrete detail and some generalisations about your thoughts and feelings  Makes a broad analysis of how the events affected you  Subjectively analyses the experience  Describes feelings/thoughts that are simple obvious statements  Has limited elaboration on ideas in relation to analysis Reflect on your personal development. (30% weighting)  Highlights new insights that show an understanding of how you learn  Develops effective conclusions and action plans that explain how you would use this new knowledge  Evaluates the benefit of the experience  Provides details of future action plans and modifications that explain how you would use this new knowledge  Outlines what has helped you to learn  Develops conclusions and contains a personal action plan clearly linked to your analysis  Lists what has been learned or needs to have been learned  Partially develops personal action plans loosely linked to your analysis  Has limited elaboration on ideas in relation to analysis  Contains insufficient detail in its action plan Reflective writing style (10% weighting)  Driscoll’s Model of Reflection used expertly  Uses clear and concise expression free from spelling, punctuation errors  References correctly  Driscoll’s Model of Reflection used comprehensively  Generally use clear expression, free from spelling, punctuation and grammatical errors  Generally reference correctly  Driscoll’s Model of Reflection attempted with moderate success  Mostly expresses your ideas clearly with some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors  Has very few referencing errors in text or reference list.  Driscoll’s Model of Reflection used to guide discussion  Sometimes has unclear expression, and there are some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors.  Has some referencing errors in text and/or reference list  Driscoll’s Model of Reflection not attempted or not used effectively  Expresses your ideas in ways that lack clarity, and there are spelling and grammar errors.  Has many errors in the reference in text and/or reference list.