HSH 703 Health Promotion Assessment task 2b REPORT Rubric Health Promotion Interventions for the 21st century Words approx. 3000 Weighting 45% Due in Thursday 1st June 5pm Criteria Masterly Competent Achieved Developing Needs work Introduction Approx. 200 words 2 marks Clear, concise and comprehensive introduction. 2 Informative introduction. 1.5 Good introduction. 1.5 Cursory introduction. 1 Absent or incomplete introduction. < 1 Identification of determinants of health Approx. 500 words 7 marks Highly evolved map of determinants for chosen health topic and population group, and also reflective of HP intervention. Systems thinking evident through connection between determinants. Use of extensive, recent and relevant references 5.5 - 7 Solid map of determinants and competent linking between determinants, also related to HP intervention. Wide range of references used. 5 Evident determinants identified and linked, inclusive of HP intervention. Good range of references 4.5 Attempt made to map determinants with some links. Reference to HP intervention weak or cursory. Basic readings utilized. 3.5 - 4 Few determinants, mainly listed. No reference to HP intervention. Poor or few references used. <3.5 Assessing Health Promotion (HP) intervention against a health promotion framework Approx. 500 words 7 marks Clearly articulated HP framework diligently and effectually utilized to assess HP capacity of HP intervention. Linked intelligently to references 5.5 - 7 Strongly defined HP framework applied effectively to HP intervention. Well referenced. 5 Good application to HP framework. References relevant. 4.5 Rudimentary assessment of HP capacity. Basic reference. 3.5-4 HP framework absent or poorly defined and applied to HP intervention. References poor or absent. < 3.5 Comparing Health Promotion (HP) intervention to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (WHO 2008): three principle areas of action. Approx. 300 words 5 marks Demonstrated masterly comparison of the three principle areas of action with HP intervention. 5 - 4 Strong comparison of the three principle areas of action with HP intervention. 3.5 Good comparison of the three principle areas of action with HP intervention. 3 Three principle areas of action compared with HP intervention. 2.5 Poorly understood three areas of action weakly compared, or absent, with HP intervention. < 2.5 Congruency with TWO of Kickbusch ‘s (2012) five key determinants of health for 21st Century. Approx. 400 words 6 marks High order discussion of HP intervention in context of TWO of Kickbusch’s (2012) five key determinants of health. 5 - 6 Very good discussion of HP intervention in context of TWO of Kickbusch’s (2012) five key determinants of health. 4 - 4.5 Good discussion of HP intervention in context of TWO of Kickbusch’s (2012) five key determinants of health. 3.5 Discussion of HP intervention in context of TWO of Kickbusch’s (2012) five key determinants of health. 3 Poorly discussed, or absent, discussion of HP intervention in context of TWO of Kickbusch’s (2012) five key determinants of health. < 3 Identification and discussion of systems approach/comple x thinking informing the Health Promotion intervention Approx. 450 words 6 marks Intelligently identified how systems approach/comple x thinking informs the health promotion intervention, strongly supported with references 5-6 Very well identified how systems approach/comple x thinking informs the health promotion intervention, well supported with references 4-4.5 Good identification of how systems approach/comple x thinking informs the health promotion intervention, supported with references 3.5 Attempt to identify how systems approach/comple x thinking informs the health promotion intervention, some references utilized 3 Weak or absent identification of how systems approach/comple x thinking informs the health promotion intervention, references inadequate or absent. <3 Assessing for synergies between health equity and action on sustainability. Approx. 450 words 6 marks High order assessment of the HP intervention for synergy between health equity and action on sustainability. 5-6 Very good assessment of the HP intervention for synergy between health equity and action on sustainability 4-4.5 Good assessment of the HP intervention for synergy between health equity and action on sustainability 3.5 Some assessment of the HP intervention for synergy between health equity and action on sustainability 3 Poor, or absent, assessment of the HP intervention for synergy between health equity and action on sustainability <3 Conclusion Approx. 300 words 3 marks Credible and persuasive conclusion surmising the status of the HP intervention for 21st Century. 2.5 - 3 Strong conclusion surmising the status of the HP intervention for 21st Century. 2 Good conclusion surmising the status of the HP intervention for 21st Century. 2 Conclusion surmising the status of the HP intervention for 21st Century. 1.5 Poor or absent conclusion surmising the status of the HP intervention for 21st Century. < 1.5 Correct grammar, use of referencing 3 marks Outstanding expression and grammar, free of spelling errors. Meticulous referencing utilizing one consistent referencing protocol. 2.5 - 3 Very good grammar and expression, only few spelling errors and consistent application of one referencing protocol. 2 Good grammar and expression some spelling errors and mostly consistently referenced. 2 Grammar and expression mostly consistent. Several spelling errors. Inconsistent referencing. 1.5 Poor expression and grammar. Numerous spelling errors. Referencing absent or inadequately executed. < 1.5 Total