MGT5PMT: Assessment 4 marking rubric
CRITERIA
Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%)
Implementation plan
(25% of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification and supporting discussion of relevant actions required for successful project implementation. (21-25 marks)
☐ Very good identification and supporting discussion of relevant actions required for successful project implementation.
(18-20 marks)
☐ Good identification and discussion of relevant actions required for successful project implementation.
(15-17 marks)
☐ Fair identification of relevant actions required for successful project implementation.
(13-14 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or missing implementation plan.
(<12 marks)
Management plan
(30% of total mark)
☐ Excellent explanation of how the project will be managed, including details and justification of which tools and techniques will be used (24-30 marks)
☐ Very good explanation of how the project will be managed, including details of which tools and techniques will be used
(21-23 marks)
☐ Good explanation of how the project will be managed, including details of which tools and techniques will be used
(18-20 marks)
☐ Fair explanation of how the project will be managed.
(15-17 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or missing management plan.
(<15 marks)
Project evaluation
(20% of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification, discussion and justification of which methods, tools and techniques will be used to evaluate the project. (16-20 marks)
☐ Very good identification and discussion of which methods, tools and techniques will be used to evaluate the project.
(14-15 marks)
☐ Good identification and discussion of which methods, tools and techniques will be used to evaluate the project.
(12-13 marks)
☐ Fair identification of which methods, tools and techniques will be used to evaluate the project.
(10-11 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or missing evaluation plan.
(<10 marks)
Project closure
(10 % of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification and explanation of the steps and activities required to close the project (8-10 marks)
☐ Very good identification and explanation of the steps and activities required to close the project (7 marks)
☐ Good identification of the steps and activities required to close the project
(6 marks)
☐ Fair identification of some of the steps and activities required to close the project
(5 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or missing details of project closure
(<5 marks)
Resubmission of Assessments 1 & 2
(5 % of total mark)
☐ Resubmission of Assessments 1 & 2, incorporating changes required by the intervention. (5 marks)
☐ Resubmission of Assessments 1 & 2, incorporating some of the changes required by the intervention.
(3-4 marks)
☐ No resubmission of earlier assessments, or resubmission without incorporating changes.
(<2 marks)
Writing and referencing
(10% of total mark)
☐ Excellent use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing used throughout. Excellent grammar and spelling. (8-10 marks)
☐ Very good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Correct referencing, and very good grammar and spelling.
(7 marks)
☐ Good use of relevant and appropriate sources of literature. Mostly correct referencing. Good grammar and spelling. (6 marks)
☐ Fair use of relevant sources of literature. Some referencing errors. Some grammar and spelling errors. (5 marks)
☐ Few if any literature sources included and poor standard of referencing. Poor spelling and grammar. (< 5 marks)