Marking criteria for the assignment 3 for CIS8004 Student Name: Student #: Marking criteria
Mark Awarded ACTIVITIES 1. The report should be well structured and cover at least the following topics: - Structure o Properly formatted well presented business report o Executive Summary o Recommendations o Conclusion - References o 10 References at least o Relevant citations within the report Marker Feedback:
2. Descriptions and justifications of the solution design; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback:
/10
3. Description strategies of Customer Journey;
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points)
Marker Feedback:
/10
4. Description and justification of Information Architecture;
/8
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points)
Marker Feedback:
5. Technology architecture;
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback:
/8
6. Work breakdowns and work package decomposition;
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 3 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (4 – 6 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (7 – 10 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (11 – 15 points) Marker Feedback:
/15
7. Sequencing of activities;
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 5 points)
/10
3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (6 – 7 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (8 – 10 points) Marker Feedback:
8. Timelines;
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (17 – 8 points) Marker Feedback:
/8
9. Refine list of CSF; 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 10 points) Marker Feedback:
/10
10. Pre-implementation plan and strategies; and 1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback:
/8
n Post-implementation plan and strategies .
1: Poor (lack of understanding grammar and spelling mistakes, no references and research, poor expression) (0- 2 points) 2: Average (minimum understanding, grammar and spelling mistakes, limited references and research, weak expression) (3 – 4 points) 3: Good (good understanding, no grammar and spelling mistakes, good references and research, acceptable expression) (5 – 6 points) 4: Excellent (great understanding, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors, great references and research) (7 – 8 points) Marker Feedback:
/8
11. Quality and relevance of Conclusion(s)/recommendations 1: Poor (poor conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (0- 1 points) 2: Average (weak conclusion and recommendations, grammar and spelling mistakes) (2 points) 3: Good (good conclusion, no grammar and spelling mistakes, acceptable expression) (3 – 4 points) 4: Excellent (great conclusion, expressed well with no grammatical or spelling errors) (5 points) Marker Feedback:
/5
12. Less late submission as per USQ/BELA policies and procedures Total /100
OVERALL COMMENTS
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________