Criteria Weight Greatly exceeds expectations 4 Exceeds expectations 3 Meets expectation 2 Below expectation (fail) 1 Inadequate(fail) 0 Background Information A client–centred introduction to the child and their family. Presented in an informative yet succinct manner. 1 A concise introduction that presents the required information. Quality of introduction is to an exceptional standard. A brief introduction that presents the required information. Quality of introduction is to a high standard. A brief introduction that presents the required information. Quality of introduction is adequate. An introduction that presents some of the outlined information. Information is missing and quality of introduction is inadequate. An introduction is not included and/or does not present any relevant information to the case study. HSO205 Trimester 1 2017 Assessment Task 3: Case Study Report Due date: Sunday 28th May. 11.59 pm HSO205 CloudDeakin Assessment Task 3 on-line drop box Weight & word count : 40 % of unit marks. 2000 words Task: Choose 1 from the 4 video and background information case studies provided, and write a professional report of 2000 words addressing the following. 1. Background information about the child and family. 2. Describe the specific health condition. Analyze and discuss the likely implications of the health condition on the child’s occupational performance. 3. Illustrate the impact on the child’s occupational performance using observations (from video) or reported (from background information) in key occupations. 4. Discuss possible assessment & intervention techniques used by OT’s related to the case study 5. Outline and discuss possible family centered issues and link to PEOP model. Describe the specific health condition. Analyze and discuss the likely implications of the health condition on the child’s occupational performance. Substantiate the implications using observations of the child’s performance components from background information and/or video footage observations 3 Discussion of relevant aspects of the condition/diagnosis including specific features and presentation is demonstrated to an exceptional standard. Appropriate references are used to support discussion of diagnosis. Depth of knowledge is to an extremely high standard. Observations of performance components relevant to the child, are accurate and to an exceptional standard. Discussion of relevant aspects of the condition/diagnosis including specific features and presentation is demonstrated to a high standard. References are used to support in discussion of diagnosis. Depth of knowledge is to a high standard. Observations of performance components relevant to the child, are accurate and to a very good standard. Discussion of relevant aspects of the condition/diagnosis including specific features and presentation. References may or may not be used. Depth of knowledge is adequate. Observations of performance components relevant to the child, are accurate and to an adequate level. Aspects of the condition/diagnosis including features are briefly presented. References are not used to discuss diagnosis. Depth of knowledge is inadequate. Observations of performance components relevant to the child, are inadequate or inappropriately reported. Discussion of relevant aspects of the condition/diagnosis including specific features and presentation is not provided or irrelevant to the case study. Implications on occupational performance and/or observations absent or inaccurate. Discusses impact on occupational performance tasks (self-care, leisure/play, work). 2 The impact on the child’s participation in occupational performance tasks are discussed in detail and follow a logical format. Discusses likely and current implications of the child’s condition on their occupational performance to an exceptional standard. The impact on the child’s participation in occupational performance tasks are discussed in detail and follow a logical format. Discusses likely and current implications of the child’s condition on their occupational performance to a very good standard. The impact on the child’s participation in occupational performance tasks are discussed in detail and follow a logical format. Discusses likely and current implications of the child’s condition on their occupational performance to an adequate standard. Likely and current implications of the child’s condition on their occupational performance is inadequately discussed. Likely and current implications of the child’s condition on their occupational performance is not discussed. Discuss possible evidenced informed assessment & intervention techniques used by OT’s related to the case study 2 Discussion includes 3 relevant assessments and 3 intervention techniques with evidence of in-depth research and knowledge. Exceptionally well matched and clinically relevant to the case study. Discussion includes 3 relevant assessments and 3 intervention techniques. Assessments and intervention strategies link to each other and are highly relevant to the case study. Discussion includes 2 relevant assessments and at least 2 intervention techniques. Assessments and Intervention strategies link to each other and are relevant to the case study. Discussion includes 1 relevant assessment and less than 2 intervention techniques. Assessments and Intervention strategies may lack detail and may not link to each other or the case study. Assessment and/or intervention is not discussed. Possible family-centred issues are outlined throughout the report and illustrate an understanding of the application of the PEOP model. 2 3+ family-centred issues are identified and discussed throughout the report and link well with the discussion. Discussion is of an exceptionally high standard and understanding into family issues is demonstrated. PEOP model is applied exceptionally well. 3 family-centred issues are identified and discussed throughout the report and link well with the discussion. Discussion is of a high standard and understanding into family issues is demonstrated. PEOP model is applied to a high standard. At least 2 familycentred issues are identified and discussed in relation to the client in adequate detail. PEOP model is applied adequately. 1 family-centred issue is identified and/or discussed. Detail is inadequate. The PEOP model may be briefly mentioned but limited in detail or is not applied No family-centred issues are presented. The PEOP model is not evident. Range of relevant & professional references using appropriate APA (6th ed) format as outlined in an attached bibliography. 1 More than 6 references are included which are all current journal articles and text references. References are relevant to the case study. References in APA (6th ed.) style – all correct. More than 5 references are included which are mostly current journal articles and text references. References are relevant to the case study. References are in APA (6th ed.) style. Minimal errors. 4-5 relevant references are included. At least 2 journal articles are used. References are in APA (6th ed.) style. Some errors Less than 3 references and not including 2 journal articles. Incorrect referencing. 0 references are used. Professional writing style: clear presentation, correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. Logical use of headings and professional language used throughout. 1 Report is written in sentence format with no errors in grammar or spelling. Abbreviations are initially explained. Headings are used to add clarity and one topic per paragraph. Where appropriate, clear dot points are used. Writing is exceptionally clear and succinct. Report is written in sentence format with minimal grammar or spelling errors. Abbreviations are initially explained. Headings are used to add clarity and one topic per paragraph. Where appropriate, clear dot points are used. Writing is clear and succinct. Report is written in sentence format with mostly correct grammar and spelling. Writing is generally clear throughout. Poor sentence structure and/or spelling and grammar. Abbreviations are not initially explained, headings and dot points are not used and paragraphs do not flow. Inadequate sentence structure, spelling and grammar. Abbreviations are not explained, headings and dot points are not used and paragraphs do not flow. Essay is difficult to follow. Mark /48