Assignment Task 3
This rubric is intended to communicate certain expectations of quality relative to the tasks of this
assessment item. It is also intented to promote consistency, objectivity, transparency,
accountability and ownership.
Levels of Achievement
Criteria High
Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Task
Compliance
– answered
task
questions.
85 to 100 %
Fully addresses
all aspects of
the writing
assignment.
Stays on task
throughout and
answers all
questions.
75 to 84 %
Addresses all
aspects of the
writing
assignment.
65 to 74 %
Unevenly
addresses the
topic:
digresses at
times or some
questions not
fully answered.
50 to 64 %
Writes within the
topic, but fails to
specifically address
the writing
assignment.
0 to 49 %
Does not
address the
writing
assignment.
Mostly off-topic
throughout the
writing.
Research,
data
acquisition
and
referencing
85 to 100 %
Evidence of
broad,
systematic and
creative
research.
Selection of
data goes
beyond the
mainstream
literature/tutorial
/textbook.
Consistent and
accurate
referencing
used
throughout,
showing ability
to reference a
range of source
types. Ideas
and words of
others
acknowledged.
75 to 84 %
Evidence of
controlled and
systematic
research.
Demonstrates
selection of
credible,
relevant data
from quality
literature/tutorial
notes/textbooks.
Mostly accurate
referencing
demonstrates
an ability to
reference a
variety of
source types.
Ideas and
words of others
are
acknowledged.
65 to 74 %
Evidence of
good research
skills.
Information is
gathered from
a good range
of electronic
and
non-electronic
sources.
Referencing is
at times
inconsistent or
demonstrates
ability to
reference only
some source
types
accurately
Words, but not
always the
ideas of others
are
acknowledged.
50 to 64 %
Research
conducted
demonstrates an
attempt to collect
credible and/or
relevant data.
Information is
gathered from a
limited range of
electronic and
non-electronic
sources. Overuse
of another’s words
or ideas which may
also inconsistently
or inaccurately
referenced. Some
acknowledgement
of texts consulted
in a general
bibliography.
0 to 49 %
Limited
research skills
demonstrated.
Poorly
selected data.
Failure to
acknowledge
the words and
ideas of
others.
Plagiarised:
reads like a
“data dump”
from other
sources.
Application
of data
/frameworks
/theories
85 to 100 %
Demonstrates
skilful use of
high quality,
credible,
relevant data to
support
arguments:
effective
analysis and
discussion of
relevant issues
to develop the
report.
75 to 84 %
Demonstrates
consistent use
of credible,
relevant data to
support
arguments/
Appropriate
analysis and
discussion used
in the
development of
the report.
65 to 74 %
Demonstrates
an attempt to
use credible
and relevant
data to support
arguments.
Some analysis
and discussion
appropriately
used in the
development
of the report.
50 to 64 %
Demonstrates an
attempt to use data
to support
arguments.
Analysis and
discussion reveals
some
misunderstandings.
0 to 49 %
Connection
between data
and arguments
is unclear or
non-existent.
Limited or
poorly focused
discussion and
analysis.
Topic
Development
88 to 100 %
Full and rich
development:
75 to 84 %
Clear and
complete
65 to 74 %
Topic
development
50 to 64 %
Topic development
is incomplete or
0 to 49 %
Simplistic
statement of
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
30.00%
Weight
20.00%
Weight
30.00%
Weight
S216 MAN515 OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT https://online.cdu.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?di...
1 of 2 7/09/2016 10:54 AMLevels of Achievement
Criteria High
Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
confident
identification
and discussion
of the most
relevant issues
and principles.
Shows
sophistication in
thinking and
approach.
development of
content;
identification
and discussion
of the most
relevant issues
and principles.
A controlled
approach
demonstrates
strong
understandings.
is clear, but
lacks depth in
places:
incomplete
identification
and discussion
of most
relevant issues
and principles.
unclear;
inadequate focus
and relevance in
explanations
suggests
incomplete
understandings of
issues and
principles.
content; often
copied from
sources or lists
of information
demonstrating
failure to
develop own
focus and
explanations.
Expression,
structure
85 to 100 %
Clear and fluent
expression
indicates the
report has been
successfully
edited and
proofread
before
submission.
Correct form for
text type:
(headings,
indentations
etc.); spelling,
punctuation
error-free.
75 to 84 %
Mastery of
sentence
patterns
demonstrated;
may have
occasional
grammatical
errors on the
sentence level
suggesting that
some closer
proofreading
was needed
Form,
punctuation,
and spelling
mostly error
free.
65 to 74 %
Sentence
patterns most
often
successfully
used; several
grammatical
errors at the
sentence level.
Occasional
errors in, form,
punctuation,
and spelling;
sometimes
distracting.
Some
additional
editing and
proofreading is
warranted.
50 to 64 %
Simple and
complex sentences
attempted but often
unsuccessfully;
grammatical errors
distract from
meaning. Form,
punctuation, and
spelling errors are
distracting.
0 to 49 %
Run on
sentences,
attempts at
simple
sentences
often not
successful;
many errors in
sentence
structures
detract from
communication
purpose.
Form,
punctuation
and spelling,
errors
throughout.
10.00%
Weight
10.00%
View Associated Items
S216 MAN515 OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT https://online.cdu.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?di...
2 of 2 7/09/2016 10:54 AM