Assessment 4 Reflective Journal Marking Rubric Criteria High Distinction 80-100% Distinction 70-79% Credit 60-69% Pass 50-59% Fail 0-49% Depth of Analysis ___/30 Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable. Response includes all components and meets or exceeds all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed thoroughly. Viewpoints and interpretations are supported. Appropriate examples are provided, as applicable. Response includes all components and meets all requirements indicated in the instructions. Each question or part of the assignment is addressed. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with basic arguments. Examples, when applicable, are minimally provided or are irrelevant to the assignment. Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are marginally addressed. Viewpoints and interpretations are unsupported or supported with flawed arguments. Examples, when applicable, are not provided or are irrelevant to the assignment. Response is missing some components and/or does not fully meet the requirements indicated in the instructions. Some questions or parts of the assignment are not addressed. Viewpoints and interpretations are missing, inappropriate, and/or unsupported. Examples, when applicable, are not provided. Response excludes essential components and/or does not address the requirements indicated in the instructions Recommendations/ Conclusions ___/30 Contains a summary and recommendations that is sophisticated and show a depth of knowledge Contains a summary and recommendations that successfully concludes the information report. Contains a simple summary and/or few recommendations. Contains a basic summary or recommendations. Minimal evidence of any conclusion or recommendations. Presentation ___/10 Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than three spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Writing is mostly clear, concise, and well organized with good sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. There are no more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Writing is reasonably clear and organized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are a few lapses in spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Writing is unclear and/or disorganized. Thoughts are not expressed in a logical manner. There are more than five spelling, grammar, or syntax errors per page of writing. Writing is unclear and disorganized. Thoughts ramble and make little sense. There are numerous spelling, grammar, or syntax errors throughout the response. Theory Support ___/30 Response demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Response shows strong evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. Response demonstrates a general reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Response shows evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. Response demonstrates a minimal reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Response shows some evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. Response demonstrates a token reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Response shows little evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course. Response demonstrates a no reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Response shows no evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course.