Develop a case study of a recent negotiation you were involved in, observed as a stakeholder or supporter, or that you have studied from recent history (provide a short introduction describing the negotiation at the start of your paper). (Choose a negotiation in which two parties were involved and analysis what I have done wrong in the negotiation and with the help of 7 elements explain how the negotiation could be done different)
(P. S= if you don’t understand what I’m trying to say , you can have a look at my friends assignment so that you have an idea which frameworks to use. )(((IMP)))
Your paper should then set up an analytical framework or apply a theory that explains some element of negotiation and use that framework to analyse the case. (7 elements)
This paper asks you to ‘test’ or apply the framework or theory in what is to be an analytical case analysis.
Your paper should build to convincing and well-drawn conclusions about both the framework/theory and the case.
The paper should contain academic references and a reference list. (add reference and quotes from following book - value negotiation by Horacio Falcao and negotiation evolved by Filip Hron)
Note: If your assignment refers to commercially sensitive negotiations all company and individual names should be anonymised (changed to pseudonyms) to protect anonymity, especially important due to the use
(So a short story and background (2-3 paragraphs) explaining what negotiation occurred then analyse the negotiation and then say what could been done differently using the framework)
All the frameworks that is to be included will let you guys know the professor is very strict on markings and knows inside out of negotiation so I need professional who has subject knowledge about negotiation.
Before selecting the story of the negotiation, you will analyse on, do let me know on call or via email what story have you selected(((IMP)))