HBS107 Assignment 4 – Self-Awareness Audit and Reflection – T1 2017
Criterion High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Not Satisfactory
Attached completed audit
results.
All three audit reports are
complete and uploaded into
the dropbox.
Completed the 3 audits
(Interests, Values and
Skills) with no missing
elements.
Completed the 3 audits
(Interests, Values and
Skills) but with some
missing elements.
Completed 2 of the 3
audits (Interests, Values
and Skills) with no
missing elements.
Completed 2 of the 3
audits (Interests, Values
and Skills) but with
some missing elements.
Completed 1 of the 3
audits (Interests, Values
and Skills).
Marks = 20 16-20 14-15 12-13 10-11 0-9
Summary of results in
Action Plan
All 6 areas of the plan are
complete with a
comprehensive
understanding of the audit
results.
A thorough
interpretation of the
audit results and all 6
areas of the action plan
completed in detail.
An interpretation of the
audit results with most
areas of the action plan
completed in detail.
An interpretation of the
audit results with some
areas of the action plan
completed in detail.
A summary of the audit
results in all 6 action
areas or interpretation
of audit results with 3
action areas completed.
A summary of the audit
results with less than 6
action areas completed
or an interpretation of
the audit results with
less than 3 action areas
completed.
Marks = 20 16-20 14-15 12-13 10-11 0-9
Reflection part 1
Competed all 3 parts of the
question and referred to
relevant literature with a
comprehensive
understanding of the theory
and relating this to their
individual audits.
Has comprehensively
understood reflection
and demonstrated this
by reflecting on the
audit results.
Has understood
reflection and
demonstrated this by
reflecting on most of
the audit results.
Has understood
reflection and
demonstrated this by
reflecting on some of
the audit results.
Has a basic
understanding of
reflection, but with
minimal reflection on
the audit results.
Has not understood
reflection and has not
reflected on the audit
results.
Marks = 20 16-20 14-15 12-13 10-11 0-9HBS107 Assignment 4 – Self-Awareness Audit and Reflection – T1 2017
Reflection part 2
Choose 1 relevant
determinant of health (DoH),
show an understanding of
this determinant by defining
it and then use it to interpret
the audit results.
Chose 1 relevant DoH,
has shown a
comprehensive
understanding of the
determinant by defining
it and then used it to
thoroughly interpret
the audit results.
Chose 1 relevant DoH,
has shown an
understanding of the
determinant by defining
it and then used it to
interpret the audit
results.
Chose 1 DoH, has
shown a basic
understanding of the
determinant by defining
it and then used it to
interpret the audit
results. Stronger links
between the DoH and
results were required.
Chose 1 DoH, has
shown minimal
understanding of the
determinant and linked
this to the audit results
at a basic level.
Has not discussed 1
relevant DoH and has
not shown an
understanding or linked
this to the audit
findings.
Marks = 30 24-30 21-23 18-20 15-17 0-14
Written clarity, presentation
& referencing
Assignment is wellstructured, clear, logically
presented, free from
grammatical and
typographical errors.
Adequately and correctly
referenced using peer –
reviewed journals, textbooks
or reputable websites in line
with teaching of HBS107.
Excellent standard of
presentation; no
mistakes in spelling,
punctuation or
grammar; language
clearly and effectively
communicates ideas.
Excellent referencing
with no mistakes
Meets all presentation
requirements (spacing,
font, page numbers and
word count)
Generally very good
standard of
presentation; some
occasional, minor errors
that do not detract
from meaning;
language generally;
communicates ideas
well. Meets most of the
presentation
requirements (spacing,
font, page numbers and
word count).
Very good referencing
with minimal errors
Generally a good
standard of
presentation; some
errors; communication
faults which leads to
lack of clarity in parts;
Meets some of the
presentation
requirements (spacing,
font, page numbers and
word count).
Generally good
referencing with some
errors
A fair attempt but some
problems with the
standard of
presentation (spelling,
punctuation, grammar);
multiple errors which
detract from the ideas
communicated; Lacking
presentation
requirements (spacing,
font, page numbers and
word count).
Multiple errors in
referencing, including
under-referencing of
sources and relevant
references.
Work contains
frequent, serious errors
in spelling, punctuation
and grammar.
No presentation
requirements met.
Substantial problems
with referencing,
including substantial
under-referencing, or
information that is not
relevant nor from a
credible source.
Marks = 10 8-10 7 6 5 0-4