MGT5PMT: Assessment 4 marking rubric
CRITERIA
Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%)
Implementation plan
(25% of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification and
supporting discussion of
relevant actions required for
successful project
implementation.
(21-25 marks)
☐ Very good identification and
supporting discussion of relevant
actions required for successful
project implementation.
(18-20 marks)
☐ Good identification and
discussion of relevant actions
required for successful project
implementation.
(15-17 marks)
☐ Fair identification of
relevant actions required for
successful project
implementation.
(13-14 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or
missing implementation
plan.
(<12 marks)
Management plan
(30% of total mark)
☐ Excellent explanation of
how the project will be
managed, including details
and justification of which tools
and techniques will be used
(24-30 marks)
☐ Very good explanation of how
the project will be managed,
including details of which tools and
techniques will be used
(21-23 marks)
☐ Good explanation of how the
project will be managed,
including details of which tools
and techniques will be used
(18-20 marks)
☐ Fair explanation of how
the project will be managed.
(15-17 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or
missing management
plan.
(<15 marks)
Project evaluation
(20% of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification,
discussion and justification of
which methods, tools and
techniques will be used to
evaluate the project.
(16-20 marks)
☐ Very good identification and
discussion of which methods, tools
and techniques will be used to
evaluate the project.
(14-15 marks)
☐ Good identification and
discussion of which methods,
tools and techniques will be
used to evaluate the project.
(12-13 marks)
☐ Fair identification of
which methods, tools and
techniques will be used to
evaluate the project.
(10-11 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or
missing evaluation plan.
(<10 marks)
Project closure
(10 % of total mark)
☐ Excellent identification and
explanation of the steps and
activities required to close the
project
(8-10 marks)
☐ Very good identification and
explanation of the steps and
activities required to close the
project
(7 marks)
☐ Good identification of the
steps and activities required to
close the project
(6 marks)
☐ Fair identification of some
of the steps and activities
required to close the project
(5 marks)
☐ Poor, unclear or
missing details of project
closure
(<5 marks)
Resubmission of
Assessments 1 & 2
(5 % of total mark)
☐ Resubmission of
Assessments 1 & 2,
incorporating changes
required by the intervention.
(5 marks)
☐ Resubmission of Assessments 1 & 2, incorporating some of the
changes required by the intervention.
(3-4 marks)
☐ No resubmission of earlier assessments, or
resubmission without incorporating changes.
(<2 marks)
Writing and
referencing
(10% of total mark)
☐ Excellent use of relevant
and appropriate sources of
literature. Correct referencing
used throughout. Excellent
grammar and spelling.
(8-10 marks)
☐ Very good use of relevant and
appropriate sources of literature.
Correct referencing, and very good
grammar and spelling.
(7 marks)
☐ Good use of relevant and
appropriate sources of
literature. Mostly correct
referencing. Good grammar and
spelling.
(6 marks)
☐ Fair use of relevant
sources of literature. Some
referencing errors. Some
grammar and spelling
errors.
(5 marks)
☐ Few if any literature
sources included and
poor standard of
referencing. Poor spelling
and grammar.
(< 5 marks)