HC1021 – HF1004: Interpersonal Communication/Business Practice Peer Evaluation of Individual Participation in Group Must be included with group report as part of the assessment To be completed by each student with final scores for the group calculated as a total and advised to ALL group members then submitted with group report (one sheet only per group) Please give a mark out of 100% to the team member(s) who you believed made the greatest contribution to the team (including yourself). Please rate the contribution of each other member of your team on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 means they made no contribution and 50 means they made half the contribution of the team’s leading contributor. The captain of the group will calculate everyone’s individual scores from their team and the lecturer will finalise the individual mark each based on the assignment score. Some of the factors you may like to take into consideration are; • Level of participation in team discussions and activities • Helped keep the team focused on the task • Contributed useful ideas • Did a fair share of workload • Quality of output • Level of communication and response to task requests Team members’ names (incl your own) Student ID Number Contribution (out of 100)% 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Please provide explanations for ratings of 70 or less, and if appropriate, describe how you have attempted to encourage the team member to improve their performance. These comments are reviewed if students appeal their peer evaluations, so it is important that your explanations are factual, legible and professional. (You can write additional comments on the reverse side of this sheet if necessary.) “In the workplace, when someone is absent or not participating, the team has to pick up the slack but the absent member still benefits from the team work. If the absent/non-participative person has a good reason for this and explains the reason to the team, and does their best to make amends, most teams will gladly extend the benefit. If, however, members have doubts about the reason for the absence or lack of participation they feel like the member is trying to “freeload”. This then is likely to be a black mark that may not be forgotten when the peer evaluations come around. So, if you have to be absent or you have a valid reason for not participating, let your peers know in advance and make sure that you do your best to make up for it. Otherwise, you are at risk"