Assignment 2 - Motivating Staff
Engaging and motivating employees is at the centre of Strategic Human Resource
Management (SHRM) practices. It is therefore important to identify the organisational
practices that can be used to foster the cognitive, emotional and behavioural qualities that
will positively impact on employees and enhance their motivation.
Levels of Achievement
Criteria High
Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Able to
identify
potential
sources
(organisational
HRM
practices) that
positively
influence
affective and
behavioural
processes
85 to 100 %
Identified and
discussed in
depth a
variety of
HRM
practices that
have a
positive
influence on
employees’
affective and
behavioural
processes
75 to 84 %
Identified
some HRM
practices that
have a
positive
influence on
employees’
affective and
behavioural
processes.
Discussed in
reasonable
depth
65 to 74 %
Limited HRM
practices
were
identified for
motivating
and engaging
employees at
work. Not
discussed in
great depth
50 to 64 %
Very limited
HRM
practices
were
identified for
motivating
and engaging
employees at
work. Very
limited
discussion
0 to 49 %
No HRM
practices or
incorrect HRM
practices
identified for
motivating and
engaging
employees.
No attempt to
discuss HRM
practices
Use
appropriate
motivational
theories to
identify the
relationship
between
Hackman and
Oldham’s
(1976) job
characteristics
in engaging
and motivating
employees
85 to 100 %
Demonstrated
an excellent
understanding
of the
theories.
Identified the
role of job
characteristics
in engaging
and
motivating
employees
75 to 84 %
Demonstrated
sound
understanding
of the theories
and
somewhat
identified the
role of job
characteristics
in engaging
and
motivating
employees at
work
65 to 74 %
A good
attempt to
discuss the
role of job
characteristics
in engaging
and
motivating
employees.
Good
understanding
of the theories
50 to 64 %
Reasonable
attempt to link
a theory, job
characteristics
and employee
motivation
0 to 49 %
Did not link a
motivational
theory with job
characteristics.
Very limited
discussion on
employee
engagement
and motivation
Ability to
utilise sources
such as the
Internet and
University
library
facilities to
search, locate
and
summarise
data relevant
to the
assignment
85 to 100 %
A wide range
of resources
utilised and
presented an
excellent
summary of
relevant data
summary of
relevant data
75 to 84 %
Good use of a
range of
resources.
Effective and
accurate
summary of
relevant data
presented
65 to 74 %
A reasonable
range of
sources
utilised but
could be
extended.
Summary of
data could be
improved
50 to 64 %
A small range
of sources
utilised and
demonstrated
some capacity
to summarise
data
0 to 49 %
Very limited
range of
sources
utilised. Lack
of
demonstrated
ability to
summarise
data
Name
Description
Rubric Detail
Weight
30.00%
Weight
30.00%
Weight
15.00%
S117 MAN504 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT https://online.cdu.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?di...
1 of 2 2/03/2017 2:35 PMLevels of Achievement
Criteria High
Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail
Able to
reference
correctly. Use
of a range of
credible
sources
85 to 100 %
Used
excellent
reference list
which
contains a
wide range of
sources. The
recommended
number of
references
covered.
Presented
correctly in
CDU Harvard
style
75 to 84 %
Used good
reference list
which
contains an
adequate
range of
sources. Odd
error in CDU
Harvard style
65 to 74 %
Used
reasonable
reference list,
but needed
more sources.
Some
referencing
errors in style
and
consistency
50 to 64 %
Reference list
is limited and
needs wider
range of
sources. CDU
Harvard style
not used
consistently. A
number of
referencing
errors
0 to 49 %
Major errors in
referencing.
CDU Harvard
style not used
Ability to
present a well
written,
well-structured
report
85 to 100 %
An excellently
constructed
and presented
assignment
free of
spelling,
grammatical,
punctuation
and typing
errors
75 to 84 %
Well written
and
presented
assignment.
Minor
presentation,
grammatical
and spelling
errors
65 to 74 %
Reasonably
written and
presented.
Some
spelling,
grammatical,
punctuation
and typing
errors
50 to 64 %
A fairly
coherent
assignment
but needs to
address
numerous
errors in style
and
presentation
including
spelling
punctuation
and grammar
0 to 49 %
Poorly written
and
constructed
assignment.
Major
grammatical,
spelling and
punctuation
errors
Weight
15.00%
Weight
10.00%
View Associated Items
S117 MAN504 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT https://online.cdu.edu.au/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?di...
2 of 2 2/03/2017 2:35 PM