Referencing Styles : APA Read through the case study attached and answer the questions below. The expectations forthe case study analysis is about 10 page report including the following: - Short description of the case - Background on the described management challenge - Your responses to the questions, including your opinion about the actions taken. - any further comments, observations or ideas You need to answer the below: 1. Describe what is meant by ‘sustainability’ in business. (2 marks) 2. Explain how Nestlé used a ‘waste hunting’ exercise to help in its planning. (4 marks) 3. Analyze the different elements that make up lean production. Which do you think is most important and why? (6 marks) 4. Evaluate the benefits of lean production to a business and its stakeholders. (8 marks) Referencing Styles : Harvard Describe the facts you feel underpinned the ‘McKinstry Advertising Agency’ case. Be sure to include a brief account of the ethical assumptions and values of the major stakeholders in this case. - Introduce the case facts: 250 words maximum. - What is going on in the case? - Be sure to include only that information that is directly relevant to the ethical dilemma. The inclusion of information that is not relevant to the ethical dilemma, no matter how interesting will not attract marks. NO “introduction”, “contents page” or “executive summary” required- juet get on with it! Question 2 Who was the decision-maker in the case, and what conflicting demands did they have to accommodate? (125 words maximum) -Identify who the decision-maker is… - Discuss the competing demands that the decision-maker is exposed to…. Question 3 What was the initial ethical dilemma faced by the decision-maker in this case?( 100 words maximum) -Your ethical dilemma must be expressed as two exactly opposite alternatives - be sure to conclude by stating why both alternatives are undesirable for the decision-maker specifically - REMEMBER- NO NEW FACTS can be introduced after the ethical dilemma ! - overall, you have about 500 words to use to “ get to your ethical dilemma”. Question 4 Using the Utilitarian, Kantian, Rights, and Distributive Justice approaches to ethical decision-making, provide an analysis of the initial ethical dilemma you identified in the case. (1400) - To answer this question well, you need to allocate each theory its own section ( DO NOT ‘ mix them all together’). - There is NO NEED to define the theories themselves – just apply the theories as you understand them! - After applying all of the theories, review the results and construct a final recommendation to the decision makers. As a guide you should allocate approximately 550 words to Utilitarianism,350 words to Kantianism, 250 Words to Rights, and 250 words to Justice. Question 5 Present and justify the final recommendation you would have made to the decision-maker in this case had they asked you for advice on how to resolve their initial ethical dilemma. ( 150 words maximum) - Identify and justify the final recommendation would you have made given the opportunity to consult with the decision-maker. - Make sure that you also deal with the penalty associated with that decision. NOTE: You are NOT required to define any of the ethical theories in your answer.