BUSN9231 Global Business Context: An Asia Pacific Focus – S2_2017 Assignment 3 Case Analysis Grading Rubric* Grade (out of 100): Excellent (85 – 100) Good (65 – 84) Satisfactory (51-64) Improvement required (<50) Clear explanation of key strategic issues (Situation Analysis) The problems, scope, and seriousness was clearly identified in the discussions. There was a well-focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems that demonstrated a good grasp of the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.  Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues.  Valid arguments with relevant supportive detail. Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating business strategies were easily identified  Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were identified and clearly analyzed and supported. Critical issues and key problems that   supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.  Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.   Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were poorly identified, analyzed, and supported. Appropriate analysis, evaluation, and synthesis for the specific case. There was complete data on which to base a thorough analysis Key change drivers underlying the issues were identified. Synthesis, analysis, and evaluations were clearly presented and supported in a literate and effective manner. Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were clearly identified. Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were partially identified. Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were not identified.   Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues inadequate.   Proper organization, professional writing, and logical flow of analysis. Necessary references. Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating the business logic easily identified. Key points were supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, 3rd person objective view, professional writing, and syntax. Key points were clearly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Adequate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs improvement Key points were poorly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs significant improvement * Please, attach this rubric at the end of your assignment.