MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 1 of 4 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGMT6012 Management Perspectives Assessment Assignment Two: Management Research Individual/Group Individual Length 2000 Word Limit Learning Outcomes • Understand the nature of naturally occurring data and how this can be objectively analysed to inform your practice and influence your behaviour • Analyse and discuss how the structure and characteristics of organisations can influence and constrain managers and their decision making • Identify the range of organisational stakeholders and explain how managers can manage effective relationships with them to motivate, manage and lead them to a preferred decision outcome • Apply a range of techniques and strategies to communicate effectively to a culturally diverse range of stakeholders Submission By 23:59 (SYD time) Friday of the end of Module 6 Weighting 60% Total Marks 60 marks Context: The assessment suite in this subject is designed to provide students with a framework to understand organisational behaviour, politics and the dynamics of the business environment. The assessment suite aims to equip students with the necessary skills to understand the constraints managers and emerging leaders face in developing strategies to leverage advantages and overcome constraints and barriers in organisations. Instructions: Following from the first assignment, students will create a personal SWOT analysis and comment on their fit with the organisation identified in their first assignment submission. The second assignment should include: • the use of three naturally occurring data (e.g. conversations, emails, corporate artefacts that regularly occur, etc.);MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 2 of 4 • assessment of personal strengths and weaknesses as viewed by self and others (ensure you reflect on who is giving you what feedback, how you appear to be progressing, and how you fit within the organisation where you work, or want to work); • a critical assessment of how you are placed or misplaced within the chosen organisation; and • a discussion of self-improvement for continuous improvement. The report is to be limited to 2000 words, exclusive of formal document sections (i.e. title page, executive summary, table of contents, references list, appendices, etc.), citations, tables and graphs. Students should submit one file through Turnitin. There are a number of forms the report could take. The exact form the report will depend on the additional research the student will undertake; students should aim for the demonstration of deep learning, founded on reflection, rather than on getting any aspect of the brief ‘right.’ Students should commence this assignment early, keep regular backups and ensure they submit the correct, final version. Students should use this brief as the instruction set for the assignment requirements. Additionally, the rubric below can be used to describe what unacceptable, functional, proficient, advanced and exceptional assignments might look like according to the criteria in the leftmost column of each row. As this is a Masters level subject, students are expected to engage with high-quality academic journal articles, using the Torrens University Library. Textbooks, Wikipedia and, in general, anything that can be obtained through an open Google search page are considered supplementary material, unbecoming of a postgraduate. Students should begin their reflection, if they have not already previously done it, by undertaking a Myers-Briggs Personality Type Indicator test. A free test that does not require sign-up is available here: www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp. MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 3 of 4 Learning Rubrics There are numerous ways to interpret the assessment brief. This rubric should not be used as a prescription or tick-the-box list of requirements but as a description of an amalgam of several possible interpretations and the standards they might take. The assessment will be graded holistically, based on the criteria in the leftmost column. Your interpretation may not match the rubric exactly as you may extend the requirements, using your initiative to demonstrate your mastery of the subject matter. Additionally, you may demonstrate elements described in the Advanced column and still be graded ‘Functional’ for one or more of the criteria (the reverse trend is also possible). Higher performing submissions will depend on wider reading, rather than on the rubric verbatim. Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) (Functional) Pass (Proficient) Credit (Advanced) Distinction High Distinction (Exceptional) Effective Communication (30%) Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Has little command of organisational features. Uses some cohesive devices but these may be inaccurate or repetitive. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. May not always use referencing clearly or appropriately. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Manages all aspects of cohesion well. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Skilfully manages cohesion and paragraphing. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Uses a wide range of structures with flexibility and accuracy demonstrating a sophisticated control of lexical features. MGMT6002 Assignment Two Brief Page 4 of 4 Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) (Functional) Pass (Proficient) Credit (Advanced) Distinction High Distinction (Exceptional) Assessment of strengths and weaknesses (30%) Neglects one or more elements of a SWOT analysis Completes all elements of a SWOT analysis. Elaborates all elements of the SWOT analysis beyond basic requirements. Elaborates all elements of the SWOT analysis beyond basic requirements and includes elements of political, economic, social and technological factors. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of each element of the SWOT analysis and integrates PEST analysis factors. Articulation of research principles (20%) The focus for the research question(s) or basis for the project is unclear. The rationale for the research methodology is inappropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is reasonable. The rationale for the research methodology is appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is clear. The rationale for the research methodology is stated and appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is very clear. The rationale for the research methodology is compared with alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is exceptionally clear. The Rationale for the research methodology is compared and evaluated against alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question/project. Consciousness of diversity in the case study (20%) Ignores culture difference in the case study. Fails to identify own cultural filters and their impact on thinking processes. Recognises cultural differences. Identifies cultural filters and impact on own thinking processes. Identifies, analyses and addresses diversity and workplace issues. Elaborates cultural norms, values and frameworks. Demonstrates an understanding of elements important to the history, values, politics, economy, beliefs and practices of members of other cultures. Skillfully interprets intercultural factors from the perspectives of own and other worldviews.