Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment Information Subject Code: HAT302 Subject Name: Food and Beverage Management Assessment Title: Length: Menu Review and Redesign 600 words (+/- 10% allowable range) Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online via Turnitin Due Date: Week 6 (Monday 21st of August 2017, 15:55PM AEST) . Assessment Description . The purpose of this individual assignment is to develop student skills in understanding the role of menu planning and its importance in successful Food and Beverage operations. This will enable you to learn the fundamental evaluation skills and will foster further understanding of hospitality services. Individually, you are required to review a menu from any food and beverage outlet that you frequently visit. In your review you must consider the following aspects: 1. Provide a brief review of the selected food and beverage outlet and identify its current menu concept. 2. Identify and evaluate the number of items, menu classifications, the variety of items, and item’s nutritional value. 3. Identify the potential issues in the menu design and propose an alternative menu concept. Justify the reason behind your proposed redesign. 4. Redesign the menu by creating a blueprint. In preparing your menu review, you will need to reference at least 12 sources of information. These may include corporate websites, government publications, industry reports, census data, journal articles, and newspaper articles. Your menu review and redesign document MUST follow a professional structure: Title Page Brief overview (200 words) Menu Review (400 words) Redesigned menu blueprint (attach an image of the redesigned menu) Reference List (you must apply Harvard Referencing Style) .Assessment Information COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. . Assignment Submission Students must submit their menu review and redesign via Turnitin on Monday 21st of August 2017, 15:55PM AEST This file must be submitted as a ‘PDF’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. Turnitin will notify you if there is any issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screen shot of the Turnitin error message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties that may occur Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy. Number of days Penalty 1* - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available 10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students *Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information please read the full policy via http://www.kbs.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/KBS-Assessment-Policy-v4.4_incl-SC-form-and-Med-Cert-1.pdf .COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. HAT302 Assessment Marking Rubric – Menu Review and Redesign 30% Criteria HD (High Distinction) 85%-100% DN (Distinction) 75%-84% CR (Credit) 65%-74% P (Pass) 50%-64% NN (Fail) 0%-49% Menu Review and Evaluation /40 You accurately and articulately evaluate and interpret specific Food and Beverage information You thoroughly evaluate and interpret Food and Beverage information You sufficiently evaluate and interpreted most of the Food and Beverage information You briefly evaluate some of the Food and Beverage information and your interpretation is not always relevant Your evaluation lacks depth, and your interpretation is not relevant Redesigned menu blueprint /30 Immense thought and creativity has been invested in the menu blueprint, resulting in a work that is of a professional standard The blueprint is evidently creative and, with some minor editing, would be fit for presentation to a professional audience There are some signs of creativity in this menu blueprint but quite a bit of further work is required to raise it to a professional standard There is little evidence of creativity in this menu blueprint but at least it clearly conveys the messages required in this assessment There is limited to no creativity in this menu blueprint and, further, it is unclear how its content relates to the assessment criteria Review Format /30 Score Out of 100 Correct grammar and spelling throughout the review with no obvious errors There is an obvious and logical connection between your statements, enhancing the structure, synthesis, credibility, and readability of your review Your brief is professionally presented and exceeds expectations in what is evidently suitable for a highgrade commercial environment In-text referencing and the resultant reference list are correct, with no errors Errors in grammar and spelling are rare There is a logical connection between your statements, adding to the readability and credibility of your review Your review is professionally presented and has been submitted in the appropriate format In-text referencing and the resultant reference list are correct, with only the occasional minor error Mostly correct grammar and spelling are very good but with occasional errors Ideas/themes have been developed, but connections are not always obvious. The format chosen for your brief is appropriate but some improvements would enhance its presentation Mostly correct in-text referencing and reference list with minor errors throughout and the occasional major error Even though grammar and spelling are an issue, they do not detract very much from the readability of your review Ideas/themes have been developed, but your composition lacks connections and integration. The format chosen for your review is appropriate, but major improvements would enhance its presentation An earnest attempt at in-text referencing is obvious but there are major errors Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect, impacting on the flow and readability of your review Ideas/themes have not been developed The format chosen for your review lacks thought and consideration for the intended audience In-text referencing and/or reference list is mostly incorrect or non-existent Feedback and Grades will be released via Turnitin