MGT502 Assessment Brief 3 Digital Resource Analysis Page 1 of 3 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Name MGT502 Business Communication Assessment Assignment 3 – Presentation Individual/Group Individual Length 15 minutes Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following subject learning outcomes: a) Demonstrate academic skills appropriate to the level of study b) Demonstrate research skills and referencing appropriate to the level of study d) Identify and apply effective communication methods within a business environment e) Evaluate the use and importance of technology in presenting business communication Submission Presentation Dates will be Scheduled by the Lecturer Weighting 25% Total Marks 25 marks Context: This assessment is for students to master the skills of presentation and evaluate the use of technology in business communication. Students must research different types of presentation technology, then choose one or more to use to present their recommendations from their work in assessment 2. Instructions: Prepare a presentation of the key findings and recommendations from your assessment 2 report. The presentation is fifteen minutes, highlighting the key points of the assessment 2 report to the class. The presentation must be engaging and students are encouraged to not just use Prezi or PowerPoint to supplement their presentation. It is expected that you will demonstrate in your presentation: • A comprehensive understanding of the topic you have chosen • Evidence of research and application of reliable and relevant evidence • Critical analysis and the ability to develop coherent arguments • Effective communication in the form of professional presentation skillsMGT502 Assessment Brief 3 Digital Resource Analysis Page 2 of 3 Learning Rubric: Assessment 3 - Presentation Assessment Criteria Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Choice of Presentation Channel 20% Presentation uses a traditional technology tool to reproduce their report in a visual and verbal form. Presentation uses a traditional technology tool to express the content of the presentation in an engaging way. Presentation uses a technology tool to express content in an engaging way. Presentation uses an innovative approach, combining two or more different technology tools to effectively express the content in an engaging way. Presentation uses an innovative approach, combining multiple different technology tools to effectively express the content in an engaging way. Verbal Communication 30% Verbal communication lacks clarity and does not attempt to engage the listener. Verbal communication lacks clarity but there is an attempt to engage the listener as an active participant in the presentation. Verbal communication is mostly clear and articulate but does not engage the listener as an active participant. Verbal communication is clear, articulate and engaging, going beyond reading a script to discussing the content with the audience in a way that causes them to reflect. Verbal communication is clear, articulate and engaging, going beyond reading a script to discussing the content and using tactics designed to engage the listener to be an active participant in the presentation and to reflect on its content. Visual Communication 20% Visual communication is primarily a reproduction of the essay text and is not visually appealing. Visual communication is primarily writing and images but is visually appealing. Visual communication is primarily writing and images but shows some elements of innovation in the visual elements of the presentation. Visual communication goes beyond writing and images to reproduce content in a visual way using graphs, charts, and diagrams. Visual communication goes beyond writing and images to reproduce content in a visual way using graphs, charts, diagrams, info-graphics and other innovative visual communication tools.MGT502 Assessment Brief 3 Digital Resource Analysis Page 3 of 3 Assessment Criteria Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass (Functional) 50-64% Credit (Proficient) 65-74% Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% Quality of Evaluation. 30% Limited understanding of key concepts required to support the presentation. Information is taken from reliable sources but without a coherent analysis or synthesis. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact with little questioning. Information is substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Information is taken from reliable sources, however, analysis and evaluation does not consistently reflect the relevant concepts. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research or course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Well-demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts by robust evidence from the research or course materials and extended reading. Some debate on the research is evident. Information is taken from sources with a high level of interpretation and evaluation to develop a comprehensive critical analysis of the topic. Uses research and evidence to argue viewpoints of experts.