MGT5IPM: Assessment 1 Project Execution plan marking rubric CRITERIA Excellent (> 80 %) Very good (70 – 79%) Good (60 – 69%) Acceptable (50 – 59%) Unacceptable (<50%) Structure of Project Execution Plan (PEP) ☐ Excellent PEP outline, containing all relevant sections & sub-sections, clearly explaining the need & importance for each section, justifying sections that have been omitted logically, presenting the PEP professionally. Includes all relevant supportive information. ☐ Very good PEP outline contains all relevant sections & sub-sections, explaining the need & importance for each section, justifying sections that have been omitted logically, presenting the PEP professionally. ☐ Good outline of a PEP, including most relevant sections & subsections, with explanations of the need & importance for these sections and highlighting sections omitted. ☐ Acceptable outline of a PEP, including most key sections & sub-sections, ☐ Project Execution Plan of a poor standard or missing most key sections. (30% of total mark) (24 – 30 marks) (21 – 23 marks) (18 – 20 marks (15 – 17 marks) (<15 marks) Quality of discussion of PEP sections ☐Concise and persuasive discussion of each section / sub-section demonstrates a deep understanding of the topics and their application within the PEP. Evidence of logic and insight (not repeating others’ approaches or recommendations from external sources), showing a thorough understanding of the topics. Presents a rigorous and logical approach in analysing the project execution requirement even when limited information is available at the inception stage. Proposes contingency plans to act proactively in situations which are potentially ambiguous or with high degree of uncertainty. ☐Concise and persuasive discussion of each section / sub-section demonstrates a deep understanding of the topics and their application within the PEP. Proposes contingency plans to act proactively in situations which are potentially ambiguous or with high degree of uncertainty. ☐Discussion of each section / subsections demonstrates a good understanding of the topics and applies them in the PEP. Demonstrates a sound appreciation of the external situation & other environmental factors that may impact on the section/sub-section topic. ☐Discussion of each section / sub-section demonstrates an adequate understanding of the external situation and its impacts on each section/subsection topic. ☐Discussion of the sections is either superficial or missing. (40% of total mark) (32-40 marks) (28-31 marks) (24-27 marks) (20-23 marks) (<20 marks) Use of relevant & credible publications ☐Exceeds requirements for the use of academic and/or professional body publications. Correct formatting of in-text citations and references following APA style. ☐Very good use of academic and/or professional body publications. Correct formatting of in-text citations and references following APA with all references correctly cited. ☐ Good use of academic and/or professional body publications. . Minimal errors in formatting of intext citations and references following APA with all references correctly cited. ☐Adequate use of academic and/or professional body publications meets basic requirements. May have some errors in formatting of in-text citations and references following APA style. ☐Little or no use of academic and/or professional body publications. Substantial errors in formatting in-text citations and references. (10% of total mark) (8 – 10 marks) (7 marks) (6 marks) (5 marks) (<5 marks)Identification of areas which require further information ☐ All areas which require further research or investigation are clearly identified with clear and concise explanation as to the reason why. The impact of not doing this is highlighted as risks, and processes to monitor and control these are proposed. ☐All areas which require further research or investigation are clearly identified with clear and concise explanation as to the reason why. The impact of not doing this is highlighted as risks. ☐Most areas which require further research or investigation are identified, with explanation as to the reason why. ☐Some areas which require further research or investigation are identified but without clear explanation as to the reason why. ☐Little or no attempt to identify areas which require further information. (10% of total mark) (8 –10 marks) (7 marks) (6 marks) (5 marks) (<5 marks) Writing quality, including spelling & grammar ☐ Language is sound and clear throughout, with excellent expressiveness, precision, and clarity. Excellent spelling, grammar and punctuation. ☐ Language is generally sound and clear throughout. Spelling, grammar, punctuation are good with very few and minor errors. ☐Language is clear enough to be understood.. Spelling, punctuation, grammar acceptable but could be improved. ☐Language is clear enough to be understood. May have some confused or unclear expression. May have a few moderate or several minor issues with spelling, punctuation, grammar. ☐Mostly unclear or confused expression. Major errors with spelling, grammar, punctuation. (10% of total mark) (8 –10 marks) (7 marks) (6 marks) (5 marks) (<5 marks)