SPO101_Assessment 2 Brief_Report_Module 6.Docx Page 1 of 5 ASSESSMENT BRIEF Subject Code and Title SPO101 Introduction to Sports Management Assessment Assessment 2: New sport outline report Individual/Group Individual Length 3,000 words Learning Outcomes a) Describe the global sport and recreation business environment b) Apply management and business planning tools to the sport industry c) Understand and explain risk in a sport business context d) Identify social and ethical issues that can influence the sport business community Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday - end of Module 6 Weighting 70% Total Marks 100 marks Context: Your second assessment follows on from the brief for a new sport that you submitted in assessment 1. Instructions: Develop the final form of the sport that you invented, including:  Rules of the sport o Expand and finalise the rules suggested in assessment 1  Equipment and participant needs  A risk master list including a summary of risk related issues  Venues o Playing area requirements o Seating/spectator requirements o Support areas – team, medical etc. o Media  Suggested sponsorship targets and funding avenues o Corporate sponsorship o Co-brandingSPO101_Assessment 2 Brief_Report_Module 6.Docx Page 2 of 5 o Government grants  Club and/or league organisation and structure (as applicable for team or individual sport) o Not for profit structures  Name licence, limited by guarantee o For profit legal structures  Sport business organisation and structure o At least one other sport business organisation that is allied, associated or affiliated with the sport must be indicated. This could be an equipment manufacturer, venue or other secondary organisation in the event that the sport itself is considered a not-for-profit entity  National sporting organisation structure and governance issues  Example team name, logo, colours and promotional handle  Example competition schedule  The sports overall position on social responsibility, ethics and sustainability Use appropriate referencing to acknowledge all sources utilised in your report. It is expected that you will draw heavily on your learning from all six modules covered in this subject in completing your paper.SPO101_Assessment 2 Brief_Report_Module 6.Docx Page 3 of 5 Learning Rubrics Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100) Content, Audience and Purpose 10% Does not meet minimum standard Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Meets minimum standard Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment Moves beyond minimum standard Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Exceeds minimum standard Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Exceeds minimum standard and exhibits high levels of independence Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment. Knowledge and understanding 50% Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts. A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to newSPO101_Assessment 2 Brief_Report_Module 6.Docx Page 4 of 5 situations/further learning. Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position 30% Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Makes assertions that are not justified. Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with wellformed arguments not merely assertion. Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Justifies any conclusions reached with welldeveloped arguments. Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged. Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments. Use of academic and discipline conventions and sources of evidence 10% Poorly written with errors in spelling, grammar. Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. Is written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary). Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.SPO101_Assessment 2 Brief_Report_Module 6.Docx Page 5 of 5 There are no mistakes in using the APA style. There are no mistakes in using the APA style.