MN506 System Management Assignment 2, TP1 2016 Master of Networking Assignment 2 Objectives Group Assignment (maximum 3 students in 1 group) Weight: 30 (15% of total assessment) Due Date: Week 11 by lab time Description: This assignment is to be discussed every week about half-an-hour during lab hours. Assignment is due week 11. Refer to the additional files for the scenario description and other instructions.  The assignment scenarios are described in the scenario.docx file.  Group.xlsx file contains scenario to group mapping structure according to different tutorial classes (This task needs to be done during the tutoriallaboratory class by your tutor)  Challenge Task:- Display your configuration on two or more physical computer Submission Guideline: Your assignment should be completed according to the General Guidelines for Presentation of Academic Work. 1. Write a report including a. A short introduction using 4-5 lines b. The configuration of the project you are assigned to using bullet points c. meaningful and appropriate names d. Any extra feature you have added or any difficulties you faced 2. accompanying documentation including a. Screen shots from the implementation of the chosenscenario. b. A front page - indicating your name, a statement of what has been completed and acknowledgement of the names of all people (including other students and people outside of the Institute) who have assisted you. c. List of references used (IEEE style) – please specify if none have been used. (If used) 3. The assignment must be submitted using Moodle. The pages of the assignment must be clear on each page. 4. 15 minutes per demonstration in Lab, which will cover all the features mentioned within the scope of the assigned scenario. MN506 System Management Assignment 2, TP1 2016 Master of Networking Marking criteria: Marks are allocated as follows: Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks Q1 Documentation 5 Q2 Demonstration (15 minutes demonstration) 20 Q3 Implementation using two or more physical/virtual Computer and router/switch (Scenario 6 only) 5 Poor writing Inadequate structure, careless presentation, or the report exceeds the word limit by more or less than 10% -3 Plagiarism Type of plagiarism - Copy from other student - Copy from internet source/textbook Copy from other sources -20 Total 30 MN506 System Management Assignment 2, TP3 2015 Master of Networking Marking Rubric for Assignment 2 Total Assessment Marks=25% Student Name: Student Id: Submission Due: …./…../2015 Date Submitted:.…/…/ 2015 Marker'sName: Mark Achieved: /25 Grade Mark HD 20 - 25 DI 17.5 – 19.9 CR 15 – 17.4 P 12.5 – 14.9 Fail <12.5 Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Q1 Answers are covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Answers are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Q2 Answers are covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Answers are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Q3 Answers are covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Answers are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Q4 Answers are covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Answers are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Q5 Answers are covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Answers are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic. Referencing style Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimes clear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors Presentation Excellent slides and presentation. Good slides and presentatio n. Generally OK slides and presentation. Somewhat OK slides and presentation. Irrelevant slides and presentation.