Assignment title: Information
Submission:
Due Date: Individual Reflective Essay PDF file due in Week 12 Sunday 11.59PM
Online via Turnitin
AEST)
Assessment Description.
For an optimum outcome, a reflective journal should be started in Week 1 and continued through the
trimester. Keeping a daily 'reflective diary' will help enormously but try to make contributions to your
critical reflective essay on a weekly or fortnightly basis if possible.
Becoming an effective professional manager involves reflection and critical reflection. 'Refection' requires
you to closely observe, describe and make meaning of your experiences. 'Critical reflection' requires you
to take this one step further; to analyse, reconsider and question your experiences (in this case, your
GB500 learning experiences) and relate these experiences to your previous knowledge, skills and
experiences to gain deeper and broader understandings and from there to make changes
(improvements) in your future behaviour.
For instance how have your learning experiences and the major knowledge and skills you have
developed during this subject affected you? What impact have these had on your current job and your
attitude to work? How will this impact on your practice as a manager and future business leader?
Critical reflections from GB500 Business Perspectives
You should consider the following points:
1. Your view of business before entering GB500.
2. Your goal on entering GB500 in relation to the subject matter.
3. Your reflection what you have learnt about business during GB500.
4. Areas that have interested you the most and why.
5. Make proposals on how you will develop yourself further in your professional career.
Further information and guidance:
You are urged to study On Reflection and other readings about reflection that are available on the GB500
portal page.
Beyond this, there are many models of reflective practice and, following this assessment, you might want
to conduct your own literature review in order to find ones that suit your learning and development style
(and which may well change over time due to 'accommodation').
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 ('Act'). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
NB: Title page, Reference List & Appendices do not count towards word limit of your report
You must use a minimum of 10 references. These must comprise:
• At least 6 academic articles
• Up to 2 text books (including the prescribed text)
• Up to 2 other authoritative sources of your choice. E.g. quality newspaper or professional
journal, government or NGO website. Please avoid the use of corporate websites as these tend
to be promotional and not authoritative.
•Wikipedia and other 'popular' or non-academic sources are not to be used.
Assignment Submission
The report files must be submitted by due date as a 'PDF' document to avoid any technical
issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload.
Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission and regular
penalties will apply.
The Turnitin system will notify you if there is any issue within submitted file.
In this case you must contact your lecturer via email immediately and provide a brief
description of the issue and a screen shot of the Turnitin message.
Students are also encouraged to submit their work well in advance of the time deadline to
avoid any possible delay with Turnitin similarity report generation or any other technical
difficulties that may arouse.
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business
School "late assignment submission penalties' policy.
Number of
1 - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the allocated
10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the allocated marks for the assignment.
After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after
Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be
Penalty
marks for the assignment.
the due date will not be accepted and the student will receive a
mark of zero for the assignment(s).
given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have
been returned to students
.
.
.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 ('Act'). The material
in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection
under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a
registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Marking Rubrics
Criteria HD (High Distinction)
Research o High quality research
85%-100%
effort evident with
more than twice the
recommended
referencing
requirements.
o In-text referencing
and reference list is
DN (Distinction)
75%-84%
o High degree of
research effort
evident, quality
selection and range
of scholarly sources
employed. Much
more than the
minimum number of
CR (Credit)
65%-74%
o Research is focused,
drawn from an
appropriate range of
scholarly sources,
however could be
more extensive in
nature.
o Mostly correct in-text
P (Pass)
50%-64%
o Research effort limited
however evident; both
intext referencing and
reference list
employed. At least the
minimum number of
referencing
requirements adhered
NN (Fail)
0%-49%
o Research is either absent
o In-text referencing missing