Assignment title: Information
Ethical Issues in College Athletics by John Llewellyn, Steve May, 2013, Case Studies in Organizational
Communications, May 2013
1. What clear examples of ethical lapses do you find in these case studies?
2. Does a president need a different perspective on the institution from that of an AD or coach? If
so, why? How would one be established? Enforced?
3. What is the best action to be taken for the preservation of the institution's reputation in the
cases recounted here?
4. How can ethical standards be maintained and defended in an environment where there is a
strong sense that other competitors are bending/breaking the rules?
5. Do you know student who cheer for the team on game days but roll their eyes if a student-
athlete struggles with issues in the classroom? What are the ethical dimensions of behavior as
that?
The Case of Wyeth, DesignWrite, and Premarin by Alexander Lyon and Mark Ricci, p.205, Case Studies in
Organizational Communications, Steve May, 2013
1. To what extent is it ethical for Wyeth or other companies to use convert marketing tactics like
ghostwritten medical journal articles? What marketing strategies would be ethical?
2. How ethical is it to publish research with handpicked favorable data? What ethical
responsibilities do Wyeth and other pharmaceutical companies have to disclose unfavorable
data about their drugs?
3. Are medical journal articles an appropriate channel though which to communicate marketing
messages about medications? What are the likely long term consequences for physicians and
patients?
4. What ethical obligations do medical ghostwriting firms like DesignWrite have to the physicians
who read their work? To patients who take their medicine they promote?
5. Is it ethical for DesignWrite's employees not to list their names on their writings? In what ways
does hiding the fact that Wyeth paid them for these articlesand listed expert physicians
insteadmake the articles appear objective and unbiased?
6. What ethical responsibilities do physicians who signed on as authors have to journal editors, the
scientific community, and Premarin patients generally?
7. To what extent is it ethical for physicians to frame themselves as authors of research in which
they had no meaningful or genuine role?
8. What procedures or boundaries between doctors and pharmaceutical companies should be
established to ensure more ethical working relationships and, by extension, patients' well-being
and safety?