Question 1A (10 marks)Using only information from the NTSB (2014) accident report, construct an AcciMapdiagram using the guidance provided by the document Guidelines for AcciMap Analysis(Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins, 2009).Ensure your diagram provides sufficient interacting factors, including those at higher levelsand not just those focussed on the immediate cause of the accident, to provide a clearunderstanding of how and why this accident happened.Use the sample AcciMap shown at Figure 2 of Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins (2009), as anexample of a completed AcciMap diagram. To assist in achieving this, and to avoid theconstruction of a massive and complex document that would be difficult to include in yoursubmission, take note of the guidance listed by Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins (2009, p. 203)recommending the inclusion of only two types of causes.7513NSC SMS Assessment 3/16 2If you are unsure about the computer skills needed to produce the AcciMap diagram, consultthe Information Technology specialists at the library or your fellow students (via theDiscussion Board?) about techniques to produce the AcciMap diagram as an attachment toyour Word document submission. The AcciMap diagram attachment will not be included inthe word count for this assessment. If you are unable to complete the AcciMap diagram aspart of the Word document, it is acceptable to submit a scanned document of the AcciMapdiagram you produce. Methods for submission of a scanned separate document will beadvised on request. In all cases, ensure your AcciMap is legible as I will be unable to contactyou to seek clarification.Question 1B (5 marks)Provide an analysis and discussion of your AcciMap diagram. Your discussion shoulddemonstrate your understanding of how AcciMaps assists in establishing how factors in allparts of a sociotechnical system contribute to an organisational accident (Branford, Naikar, &Hopkins, 2009, p. 193). Use any references you desire to aid your explanation.Caution: do not simply restate theory, or paraphrase sentences and statements from theaccident report (NTSB, 2014) and Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins (2009), or any of your othersources, to analyse and discuss your AcciMap diagram.Question 2 (12 marks)The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) (2013) states the framework of aSafety Management System (SMS) contains four components and twelve elements.Using each of the four SMS components as headings, and using only the supplied accidentreport (NTSB, 2014) as a source, identify one aspect of the accident for each of the fourcomponents of a SMS, that you feel could relate specifically to that SMS component.Provide an analysis and discussion of each of the four points you choose, to demonstrate yourunderstanding of its relationship with the specific SMS component. Use any references youdesire to aid your explanation.Caution: do not simply restate theory, or paraphrase sentences and statements from theaccident report (NTSB, 2014) and Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins (2009), or any of your othersources, to answer this question.Question 3 (10 marks)The Executive Summary of the accident report (NTSB, 2014, pp. xi-xv) provides a list ofsafety issues discussed in the report. One of the issues relates to the need for: More manualflight for Asiana pilots.Analyse and discuss this safety issue from two perspectives:1. Its relevance and application to the aviation industry in general, and2. What components or elements of the SMS at Asiana you would ensure are in place, toaddress this safety issue?Use any references you desire to aid your analysis and discussion.7513NSC SMS Assessment 3/16 3Caution: do not simply restate theory, or paraphrase sentences and statements from theaccident report (NTSB, 2014) and Branford, Naikar, & Hopkins (2009), or any of your othersources, to answer this question.References (3 marks)• Quality• In-text and reference list citation technique in accordance with APA 6 methodsDue DateThe due date for this assessment is Sunday, 12 June 2016.FormatSubmit your assessment as a Word document using the cover sheet instructions provided onthe Assessment>Assessment 3: Accident Analysis and the SMS page on L@G. There is norequirement for your submission to follow a Report or Essay format. This means no need foran Executive Summary, Table of Contents etc, etc, etc. Just provide your answers orresponses to the questions asked ensuring there is a properly formatted reference list at theend. Use simple headings to organise your responses i.e. Question 1, Question 2, Question 3References etc. Please make sure your answers are easily identifiable and not hidden amongsta lengthy dissertation of padding that makes it difficult for me to extract what you are sayingand therefore allocate you marks for your work.SubmissionSubmit your Word document using the instructions provided under Assessment>Assessment3: Accident Analysis and the SMS on L@G. To assist my file management, please ensureyou name your document using the following convention:Surname_Initials_StudentID_Assessment3 i.e. (Smith_AB_s1234567_Assessment3)Total Marks: 40Marking CriteriaYour submission will be marked using the criteria provided by the rubric. This is availablevia the link provided on the Assessment 3 page on [email protected] Limit (**Note the differences from Assessments 1 and 2**)I would expect that a reasonable submission for this task would need approximately 3,000words. Submissions must be within the range of not less than 2,800 words and not more than3,500 words. I would suggest you use the marks allocated as a guide to the amount of wordsexpected for each section of the task.Excluded from the word count are:• Reference list• Appendices and other attachments• AcciMaps diagram and• Cover sheetSubmissions outside of these limits will incur a reduction of your final mark by 10% of thetotal marks available per 100 words or part thereof that exceeds the limit.7513NSC SMS Assessment 3/16 4ReferencesAll external sources used to support your answers must be properly cited and listed using theAPA 6 style.Punctuation, Spelling, Grammar etc.These criteria will not be marked however at this level of study there is an expectation thatyour writing will be mature and of the highest professional presentation standard.ReferencesBranford, K., Naikar, N., & Hopkins, A. (2009). Guidelines for AcciMap Analysis. In A.Hopkins (Ed.), Learning from High Reliability Organisations (pp. 193-212). Sydney,New South Wales, Australia: CCH Australia Limited.ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organisation). (2013). Safety Management Manual (3rded.). Montreal, Canada: ICAO.NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). (2014). Descent Below Visual Glidepath andImpact With Seawall, Asiana Airlines Flight 214, Boeing 777-200ER, HL7742, SanFrancisco California, July 6, 2013. Washington, DC: NTSB